Citations per year, relative to Charles Honorton Charles Honorton (= 1×)
peers
B.J. Dunne
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Honorton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Honorton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Honorton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Honorton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Honorton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Honorton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Honorton. The network helps show where Charles Honorton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Honorton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Honorton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Honorton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Honorton. Charles Honorton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Honorton, Charles, et al.. (1998). Extraversion and ESP performance: A meta-analysis and a new confirmation.. Journal of Parapsychology. 62(3). 255.15 indexed citations
Honorton, Charles. (1993). Rhetoric over substance: the impoverished states of skepticism. Journal of Parapsychology. 57(2). 191–214.5 indexed citations
7.
Schlitz, Marilyn & Charles Honorton. (1992). Ganzfeld psi performance within an artistically gifted population.. 86(2). 83–98.22 indexed citations
8.
Honorton, Charles, et al.. (1990). Psi communication in the ganzfeld: Experiments with an automated testing system and a comparison with a meta-analysis of earlier studies.. Journal of Parapsychology. 54(2). 99–139.52 indexed citations
9.
Palmer, John, Charles Honorton, & Jessica Utts. (1989). Reply to the National Research Council Study on parapsychology.. 83(1). 31–49.11 indexed citations
10.
Honorton, Charles, et al.. (1989). "Future telling": A meta-analysis of forced-choice precognition experiments, 1935–1987.. Journal of Parapsychology. 53(4). 281–308.78 indexed citations
11.
Hyman, Ray, Charles Honorton, & David Saunders. (1985). The Ganzfeld Psi experiment: a critical appraisal. Journal of Parapsychology. 49(1). 3–91.104 indexed citations
12.
Honorton, Charles. (1985). Meta-analysis of psi ganzfeld research: A response to Hyman.. 1.71 indexed citations
13.
Honorton, Charles, et al.. (1975). Experimenter effects in extrasensory perception..21 indexed citations
14.
Honorton, Charles. (1975). “Error Some Place!”. Journal of Communication. 25(1). 103–116.49 indexed citations
15.
Honorton, Charles & Sharon L. Harper. (1974). Psi-mediated imagery and ideation in an experimental procedure for regulating perceptual input..34 indexed citations
16.
Krippner, Stanley, Charles Honorton, & Montague Ullman. (1973). An experiment in dream telepathy with "The Grateful Dead".. PubMed. 20(1). 9–17.11 indexed citations
17.
Krippner, Stanley, Charles Honorton, & Montague Ullman. (1972). A second precognitive dream study with Malcolm Bessent..16 indexed citations
Krippner, Stanley, Montague Ullman, & Charles Honorton. (1971). A precognitive dream study with a single subject..16 indexed citations
20.
Honorton, Charles. (1969). Relationship between EEG alpha activity and ESP card-guessing performance..8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.