Charles Haig
About
In The Last Decade
Charles Haig
2 papers receiving 10 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref
| Name | h | Career | Trend | Papers | Cites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Haig | 2 | 17 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 21 | ||
| Winifred Ashby United States | 4 | 16 0.9× | 8 1.0× | 2 0.4× | 2 1.0× | 4 | 35 | |||
| C. Tate Regan | 2 | 10 0.6× | 4 0.5× | 3 0.6× | 2 | 10 | ||||
| Samson Wright United States | 4 | 12 0.7× | 12 1.5× | 1 0.2× | 1 0.3× | 2 1.0× | 4 | 23 | ||
| J. A. E. Eyster United States | 2 | 6 0.4× | 9 1.1× | 2 0.7× | 2 | 25 | ||||
| Paul D. Lamson United States | 2 | 5 0.3× | 5 0.6× | 5 1.7× | 3 | 21 | ||||
| G Marcotte Canada | 3 | 9 0.5× | 12 1.5× | 6 1.2× | 1 0.3× | 1 0.5× | 4 | 20 | ||
| L. Will United States | 4 | 5 0.3× | 6 0.8× | 6 | 20 | |||||
| L. Stein United States | 2 | 8 0.5× | 15 1.9× | 2 0.7× | 2 | 20 | ||||
| S. L. Leonard United States | 2 | 10 0.6× | 3 0.4× | 2 | 16 | |||||
| ETHEL BROWNE HARVEY United States | 4 | 6 0.4× | 3 0.4× | 4 | 24 |
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Haig
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Haig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Haig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Haig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Haig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Haig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Haig. The network helps show where Charles Haig may publish in the future.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.