Charles Franklin

609 total citations
10 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Charles Franklin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Franklin has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Communication and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Charles Franklin's work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers). Charles Franklin is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers). Charles Franklin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Charles Franklin's co-authors include Dan Krewski, R. N. Curnow, Courtney Kennedy, Kristen Olson, Christopher Wlezien, Douglas Rivers, Dhavan V. Shah, Chris Wells, Joshua D. Clinton and Claire Durand and has published in prestigious journals such as Biometrics, Journal of Communication and Public Opinion Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Charles Franklin

9 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Charles Franklin United States	7	149	99	93	28	26	10	288
James Bisbee United States	11	118 0.8×	57 0.6×	68 0.7×	38 1.4×	16 0.6×	22	260
Joel A. Middleton United States	9	76 0.5×	45 0.5×	59 0.6×	12 0.4×	102 3.9×	16	260
Gregory Eady Denmark	7	295 2.0×	234 2.4×	91 1.0×	77 2.8×	14 0.5×	14	398
Corwin D. Smidt United States	8	136 0.9×	86 0.9×	152 1.6×	7 0.3×	6 0.2×	17	258
Aaron Erlich Canada	8	175 1.2×	52 0.5×	131 1.4×	24 0.9×	4 0.2×	26	282
Santiago Olivella United States	10	141 0.9×	57 0.6×	270 2.9×	21 0.8×	22 0.8×	19	380
John Ternovski United States	6	108 0.7×	75 0.8×	51 0.5×	26 0.9×	3 0.1×	9	195
Matthew Wall United Kingdom	10	121 0.8×	195 2.0×	194 2.1×	49 1.8×	3 0.1×	24	310
Ashley Esarey United States	8	228 1.5×	142 1.4×	189 2.0×	48 1.7×	4 0.2×	12	334
Junhao Hong United States	10	131 0.9×	106 1.1×	45 0.5×	14 0.5×		27	265

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Franklin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Franklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Franklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Franklin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Franklin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Franklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Franklin. The network helps show where Charles Franklin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Franklin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Franklin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Franklin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Franklin. Charles Franklin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Suk, Jiyoun, Dhavan V. Shah, Chris Wells, et al.. (2019). Do Improving Conditions Harden Partisan Preferences? Lived Experiences, Imagined Communities, and Polarized Evaluations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 32(4). 750–768. 9 indexed citations

2.

Bode, Leticia, Stephanie Edgerly, Chris Wells, et al.. (2018). Participation in Contentious Politics: Rethinking the Roles of News, Social Media, and Conversation Amid Divisiveness. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 15(3). 215–229. 11 indexed citations

3.

Wells, Chris, Katherine J. Cramer, Michael W. Wagner, et al.. (2017). When We Stop Talking Politics: The Maintenance and Closing of Conversation in Contentious Times. Journal of Communication. 67(1). 131–157. 65 indexed citations

4.

Kennedy, Courtney, Joshua D. Clinton, Claire Durand, et al.. (2017). An Evaluation of the 2016 Election Polls in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly. 82(1). 1–33. 116 indexed citations

5.

Herbst, Susan, et al.. (2011). Political Polling in the Digital Age: The Challenge of Measuring and Understanding Public Opinion. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 18 indexed citations

6.

Franklin, Charles. (2011). The Burgeoning Principle of Consistency in EU Law. Yearbook of European Law. 30(1). 42–85. 6 indexed citations

7.

Curnow, R. N., Dan Krewski, & Charles Franklin. (1994). Statistics in Toxicology.. Biometrics. 50(1). 316–316. 44 indexed citations

8.

Franklin, Charles, et al.. (1991). Functional Morphology of Gustatory Centers in the Brain of the Channel Catfish, Ictalurus Punctatus.. 1 indexed citations

9.

Franklin, Charles. (1970). The third degree. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 17 indexed citations

10.

Franklin, Charles. (1968). Woman in the case. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact