Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)
2020276 citationsYo‐Chan Ahn, Eun-Su Jang et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Chang‐Gue Son's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang‐Gue Son with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang‐Gue Son more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang‐Gue Son. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang‐Gue Son. The network helps show where Chang‐Gue Son may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chang‐Gue Son
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chang‐Gue Son.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chang‐Gue Son based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chang‐Gue Son. Chang‐Gue Son is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shin, Jang‐Woo, et al.. (2009). Four-week Repeated Dose Toxicity Test for Myelophil in SD Rats. 30(3). 79–85.4 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Jung-Sun, et al.. (2008). Study on Level of Evidence and Recommendations of Complementary and AlternativeMedicine for Cancer by Using Natural Standard Methodology. The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. 29(1). 160–176.3 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Jong‐Hoon, et al.. (2007). A Case Report of Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Lymph Node Metastasis.. The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. 28(4). 948–955.3 indexed citations
13.
Yoo, Hwa‐Seung, et al.. (2007). Wheel Balance Cancer Therapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma : A Retrospective Analysis of 62 Patients. The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. 28(3). 531–543.4 indexed citations
14.
Cho, Jung-Hyo, et al.. (2006). Analysis of Studies on Quality of Life according to Cancer Types and Symptoms. The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. 27(3). 555–560.8 indexed citations
15.
Son, Chang‐Gue, et al.. (2006). Current Status of Studies on Cancer-Related Quality of Life Instruments. The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. 27(1). 84–91.4 indexed citations
16.
Lim, Jongwon, Jung-Hyo Cho, Chang‐Gue Son, et al.. (2005). Effect of Baekyeum on Intestinal Motility. 26(4). 56–61.1 indexed citations
17.
Cho, Jung-Hyo, et al.. (2005). Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Submandible in a 56-Year-Old Woman. The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. 26(4). 941–945.1 indexed citations
18.
Lee, Gi-Jun, Jung-Hyo Cho, Chong-Kwan Cho, & Chang‐Gue Son. (2005). Case study of HBV-related Disasters in High-risk Family. 26(4). 168–173.4 indexed citations
19.
Cho, Jung-Hyo, et al.. (2004). Analysis of Survival in 273 Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Treated with Traditional Oriental Therapies. 25(4). 152–160.1 indexed citations
20.
Shin, Jang‐Woo, et al.. (2004). Effects of Armillaria mellea Extract on Macrophage and NK Cell Activity. 25(4). 161–170.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.