Chandra Shahi

607 total citations
22 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

Chandra Shahi is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Chandra Shahi has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 7 papers in Radiation and 4 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Chandra Shahi's work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (8 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers). Chandra Shahi is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (8 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers). Chandra Shahi collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Chandra Shahi's co-authors include John P. Perdew, Hong Tang, Jianmin Tao, M. G. Huber, D. A. Pushin, Aaron D. Kaplan, M. Arif, Dusan Sarenac, David G. Cory and Francesco Paesani and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Chandra Shahi

22 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chandra Shahi United States 12 220 134 68 56 56 22 373
A. Bunge Germany 4 295 1.3× 89 0.7× 59 0.9× 10 0.2× 33 0.6× 8 402
Avijit Shee United States 13 284 1.3× 78 0.6× 35 0.5× 11 0.2× 28 0.5× 21 356
C. W. S. Conover United States 12 482 2.2× 100 0.7× 22 0.3× 26 0.5× 80 1.4× 17 590
L.G. Shpinkova Russia 13 344 1.6× 79 0.6× 41 0.6× 14 0.3× 27 0.5× 39 523
Sheng‐Lung Chou Taiwan 14 217 1.0× 199 1.5× 16 0.2× 41 0.7× 41 0.7× 62 524
F. M. Quinn United Kingdom 11 158 0.7× 93 0.7× 124 1.8× 14 0.3× 82 1.5× 28 364
C. Salvo Italy 10 353 1.6× 167 1.2× 22 0.3× 11 0.2× 33 0.6× 26 497
Joseph Pedulla United States 9 282 1.3× 58 0.4× 38 0.6× 15 0.3× 26 0.5× 19 394
Peter Salén Sweden 12 429 1.9× 88 0.7× 172 2.5× 6 0.1× 208 3.7× 24 623
S. Wolf Germany 11 290 1.3× 103 0.8× 28 0.4× 6 0.1× 49 0.9× 18 387

Countries citing papers authored by Chandra Shahi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chandra Shahi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chandra Shahi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chandra Shahi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chandra Shahi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chandra Shahi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chandra Shahi. The network helps show where Chandra Shahi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chandra Shahi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chandra Shahi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chandra Shahi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chandra Shahi. Chandra Shahi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shahi, Chandra & John P. Perdew. (2025). Comment on “Accurate Correlation Potentials from the Self-Consistent Random Phase Approximation”. Physical Review Letters. 135(1). 19601–19601. 2 indexed citations
2.
Kaplan, Aaron D., et al.. (2024). Unconventional Error Cancellation Explains the Success of Hartree–Fock Density Functional Theory for Barrier Heights. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 15(1). 323–328. 13 indexed citations
3.
Tang, Hong, et al.. (2024). Effect of strain on the band gap of monolayer MoS2. Physical review. B.. 110(14). 12 indexed citations
4.
Kaplan, Aaron D., et al.. (2024). How Does HF-DFT Achieve Chemical Accuracy for Water Clusters?. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 20(13). 5517–5527. 9 indexed citations
5.
Shahi, Chandra, et al.. (2024). Symmetry breaking and self-interaction correction in the chromium atom and dimer. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 160(14). 5 indexed citations
6.
Kaplan, Aaron D., et al.. (2023). Understanding Density-Driven Errors for Reaction Barrier Heights. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 19(2). 532–543. 19 indexed citations
7.
Perdew, John P., et al.. (2022). Symmetry Breaking with the SCAN Density Functional Describes Strong Correlation in the Singlet Carbon Dimer. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 127(1). 384–389. 16 indexed citations
8.
Dasgupta, Saswata, et al.. (2022). How Good Is the Density-Corrected SCAN Functional for Neutral and Ionic Aqueous Systems, and What Is So Right about the Hartree–Fock Density?. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 18(8). 4745–4761. 35 indexed citations
9.
Wietfeldt, F. E., M. Arif, M. G. Huber, et al.. (2020). Precision Measurement of the Neutron Scattering Length of He4 Using Neutron Interferometry. Physical Review Letters. 124(1). 12501–12501. 8 indexed citations
10.
Shahi, Chandra, Biswajit Santra, Sebastian Schwalbe, et al.. (2019). Stretched or noded orbital densities and self-interaction correction in density functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 150(17). 174102–174102. 42 indexed citations
11.
Huber, M. G., Shannon Fogwell Hoogerheide, M. Arif, et al.. (2019). Overview of neutron interferometry at NIST. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 219. 6001–6001. 2 indexed citations
12.
Shahi, Chandra, Rajendra P. Joshi, Yoh Yamamoto, et al.. (2019). Self-interaction-free electric dipole polarizabilities for atoms and their ions using the Fermi-Löwdin self-interaction correction. Physical review. A. 100(1). 15 indexed citations
13.
Tao, Jianmin, John P. Perdew, Hong Tang, & Chandra Shahi. (2018). Origin of the size-dependence of the equilibrium van der Waals binding between nanostructures. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 148(7). 74110–74110. 67 indexed citations
14.
Patra, A. K., et al.. (2018). How accurate are the parametrized correlation energies of the uniform electron gas?. Physical review. B.. 97(19). 15 indexed citations
15.
Mineeva, T., M. Arif, David G. Cory, et al.. (2016). Decoupling of a neutron interferometer from temperature gradients. Review of Scientific Instruments. 87(12). 123507–123507. 11 indexed citations
16.
Arif, M., David G. Cory, M. G. Huber, et al.. (2016). Neutron limit on the strongly-coupled chameleon field. Physical review. D. 93(6). 41 indexed citations
17.
Shahi, Chandra. (2016). Measurement of neutron scattering lengths using neutron interferometry. 1 indexed citations
18.
Sarenac, Dusan, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, et al.. (2016). Holography with a neutron interferometer. Optics Express. 24(20). 22528–22528. 26 indexed citations
19.
Shahi, Chandra, M. Arif, David G. Cory, et al.. (2016). A new polarized neutron interferometry facility at the NCNR. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 813. 111–122. 11 indexed citations
20.
Pushin, D. A., M. G. Huber, Muhammad Arif, et al.. (2015). Neutron Interferometry at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advances in High Energy Physics. 2015. 1–7. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026