Chad Pope

625 total citations
10 papers, 491 citations indexed

About

Chad Pope is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chad Pope has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 491 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 4 papers in Clinical Biochemistry and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Chad Pope's work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers). Chad Pope is often cited by papers focused on Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers). Chad Pope collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Italy. Chad Pope's co-authors include Xiao‐bo Zhong, Ryan S. Funk, David B. Buckley, Andrew Parkinson, Faraz Kazmi, Ying Guo, Curtis D. Klaassen, Hong‐Hao Zhou, Xingguo Cheng and Olivier Barbier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Chad Pope

10 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chad Pope United States 7 218 133 101 85 82 10 491
How Sung Lee Singapore 10 189 0.9× 56 0.4× 55 0.5× 110 1.3× 36 0.4× 19 485
Ingalill Rafter Sweden 11 176 0.8× 118 0.9× 82 0.8× 99 1.2× 72 0.9× 11 573
Yuanbiao Guo China 15 288 1.3× 106 0.8× 92 0.9× 100 1.2× 22 0.3× 52 565
Bridgett Green United States 12 492 2.3× 229 1.7× 65 0.6× 119 1.4× 199 2.4× 13 881
Fiona A.J. van den Heuvel Netherlands 14 474 2.2× 76 0.6× 158 1.6× 226 2.7× 53 0.6× 17 783
Ieharu Hishinuma Japan 12 179 0.8× 53 0.4× 94 0.9× 43 0.5× 106 1.3× 19 599
Peixin Lu China 8 172 0.8× 141 1.1× 201 2.0× 122 1.4× 42 0.5× 17 585
Dorothy B. Colagiovanni United States 11 248 1.1× 77 0.6× 119 1.2× 63 0.7× 88 1.1× 24 634
Xiaoping Chen China 14 203 0.9× 43 0.3× 59 0.6× 244 2.9× 29 0.4× 32 520

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Pope. The network helps show where Chad Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chad Pope

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chad Pope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chad Pope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chad Pope. Chad Pope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Pope, Chad, Heather Wilkins, Russell H. Swerdlow, & Michael S. Wolfe. (2021). Mutations in the Amyloid-β Protein Precursor Reduce Mitochondrial Function and Alter Gene Expression Independent of 42-Residue Amyloid-β Peptide. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 83(3). 1039–1049. 4 indexed citations
2.
Pope, Chad, et al.. (2017). The role of H19, a long non-coding RNA, in mouse liver postnatal maturation. PLoS ONE. 12(11). e0187557–e0187557. 11 indexed citations
3.
Pope, Chad, et al.. (2017). Phenobarbital Treatment at a Neonatal Age Results in Decreased Efficacy of Omeprazole in Adult Mice. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 45(3). 330–335. 5 indexed citations
4.
Pope, Chad, et al.. (2017). Impact of Drug Treatment at Neonatal Ages on Variability of Drug Metabolism and Drug-Drug Interactions in Adult Life. Current Pharmacology Reports. 3(1). 1–9. 13 indexed citations
5.
Song, Yongfeng, Chune Liu, Jocelyn Trottier, et al.. (2017). H19 promotes cholestatic liver fibrosis by preventing ZEB1‐mediated inhibition of epithelial cell adhesion molecule. Hepatology. 66(4). 1183–1196. 126 indexed citations
6.
Pope, Chad, et al.. (2017). Targeting H19, an Imprinted Long Non-Coding RNA, in Hepatic Functions and Liver Diseases. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 11–11. 50 indexed citations
7.
Pope, Chad, et al.. (2016). Neonatal Phenobarbital Exposure Results in Decreased Proton Pump Inhibition by Omeprazole in Adult Mouse. The FASEB Journal. 30(S1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Ke, et al.. (2015). Dose of Phenobarbital and Age of Treatment at Early Life are Two Key Factors for the Persistent Induction of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Adult Mouse Liver. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 43(12). 1938–1945. 27 indexed citations
9.
Kazmi, Faraz, et al.. (2013). Lysosomal Sequestration (Trapping) of Lipophilic Amine (Cationic Amphiphilic) Drugs in Immortalized Human Hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 Cells). Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 41(4). 897–905. 188 indexed citations
10.
Guo, Ying, Chad Pope, Xingguo Cheng, Hong‐Hao Zhou, & Curtis D. Klaassen. (2011). Dose–response of berberine on hepatic cytochromes P450 mRNA expression and activities in mice. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 138(1). 111–118. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026