Cecilia Engström
- Surgery
- Gastroenterology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Natalia StambulovaLukas LinnérAlina FranckKent LindahlLars LundellJan Gunnar HatlebakkTore LindBritt‐Marie Iresjö
- Topics
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (5 papers)Eosinophilic Esophagitis (5 papers)Sport Psychology and Performance (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Cecilia Engström
18 papers receiving 582 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Surgery 235
- Gastroenterology 206
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 150
- Social Psychology 148
- Physiology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia Engström
This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia Engström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia Engström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia Engström more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia Engström
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia Engström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia Engström. The network helps show where Cecilia Engström may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecilia Engström
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecilia Engström. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecilia Engström based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecilia Engström. Cecilia Engström is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 214 | |
| 13 | How to Become a Winner in the Long-Run? Dual Career Experiences of Swedish Adolescent Athletes | 1 |
| 14 | Swedish athletes' transition and adaptation during the first year at national elite sport schools | 1 |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | 114 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Cecilia Engström
Cecilia Engström is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (5 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (5 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (206 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (150 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (77 citations). Cecilia Engström has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Natalia Stambulova, Lukas Linnér, Alina Franck, Kent Lindahl, Lars Lundell, Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk, Tore Lind, Britt‐Marie Iresjö, Kent Lundholm and Ulrika Smedh. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Annals of Surgery and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.