Catherine Chmiel

1.9k total citations
7 papers, 97 citations indexed

About

Catherine Chmiel is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine Chmiel has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 97 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Catherine Chmiel's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers). Catherine Chmiel is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers). Catherine Chmiel collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Sweden. Catherine Chmiel's co-authors include Jenny Myers, Edward Johnstone, Laura Ormesher, Colin P. Sibley, Jon O. Lundberg, Elizabeth C. Cottrell, Susan Greenwood, Eddie Weitzberg, Carina Nihlén and Mark Wareing and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal and Nitric Oxide.

In The Last Decade

Catherine Chmiel

6 papers receiving 92 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Catherine Chmiel United Kingdom	4	62	42	18	17	16	7	97
Tomoyoshi Nohira Japan	9	111 1.8×	60 1.4×	30 1.7×	37 2.2×	10 0.6×	18	240
Jeane Franco Pires Brazil	9	33 0.5×	42 1.0×	8 0.4×	21 1.2×	3 0.2×	18	160
Daniel Sottie Ghana	5	51 0.8×	34 0.8×	6 0.3×	7 0.4×	1 0.1×	8	75
Emilia Liao United States	5	18 0.3×	10 0.2×	33 1.8×	24 1.4×		9	117
Xinhua Xiao China	8	27 0.4×	29 0.7×	47 2.6×	9 0.5×	3 0.2×	12	191
D. Kyne‐Grzebalski United Kingdom	5	111 1.8×	39 0.9×	11 0.6×	8 0.5×		6	164
T. Williams United States	5	69 1.1×	35 0.8×	11 0.6×	17 1.0×		16	147
Jenna Rautanen Finland	6	13 0.2×	24 0.6×	11 0.6×	25 1.5×	2 0.1×	7	80
M.S. Radhika India	10	12 0.2×	23 0.5×	21 1.2×	61 3.6×	16 1.0×	13	217
M. Mahalakshmi India	8	238 3.8×	50 1.2×	8 0.4×	33 1.9×	4 0.3×	14	294

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Chmiel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Chmiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Chmiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Chmiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Chmiel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Chmiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Chmiel. The network helps show where Catherine Chmiel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Chmiel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Chmiel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Chmiel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Chmiel. Catherine Chmiel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Ormesher, Laura, Stephanie A. Worton, Susanna Dodd, et al.. (2023). CHronic hypERtension and L-citRulline studY (CHERRY): an Early-Phase Randomised Controlled Trial in Pregnancy. Reproductive Sciences. 31(2). 560–568. 2 indexed citations

Ormesher, Laura, et al.. (2018). A clinical evaluation of placental growth factor in routine practice in high-risk women presenting with suspected pre-eclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction. Pregnancy Hypertension. 14. 234–239. 16 indexed citations

Mistry, Hitesh, Catherine Chmiel, Louise Webster, et al.. (2018). The effect of labetalol and nifedipine MR on blood pressure in women with chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertension. 11. 92–98. 12 indexed citations

Ormesher, Laura, Jenny Myers, Catherine Chmiel, et al.. (2018). Effects of dietary nitrate supplementation, from beetroot juice, on blood pressure in hypertensive pregnant women: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility trial. Nitric Oxide. 80. 37–44. 51 indexed citations

Chmiel, Catherine, et al.. (2016). B3. Reproducibility and assessment of longitudinal confounders in the measurement of maternal haemodynamics in women with chronic hypertension in pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 29(sup2). 8–8. 2 indexed citations

Chmiel, Catherine, et al.. (2013). PM.41 Can Pulse Wave Analysis Predict Adverse Obstetric Outcome in Pregnant Women with Chronic Hypertension?. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal. 98(Suppl 1). A36.3–A37.

Smith, Debbie, Melissa Whitworth, Colin P. Sibley, et al.. (2010). The design of a community lifestyle programme to improve the physical and psychological well-being of pregnant women with a BMI of 30 kg/m2or more. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 284–284. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact