Catherine A. Bliss

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 949 citations indexed

About

Catherine A. Bliss is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine A. Bliss has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 949 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Catherine A. Bliss's work include Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers). Catherine A. Bliss is often cited by papers focused on Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers). Catherine A. Bliss collaborates with scholars based in United States. Catherine A. Bliss's co-authors include Peter Sheridan Dodds, Christopher M. Danforth, Kameron Decker Harris, Isabel M. Kloumann and Morgan R. Frank and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Computational Science and Online Learning.

In The Last Decade

Catherine A. Bliss

6 papers receiving 885 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter

2011 519 citations Peter Sheridan Dodds, Kameron Decker Harris et al. PLoS ONE profile →

Peers

Catherine A. Bliss

SNP

AI

SPS

SP

IS

Isabel M. Kloumann United States

Jalal Mahmud United States

Cristina Robles United States

Junming Huang China

Aaron Hoff United States

Jana Diesner United States

David Jurgens United States

Valerio Arnaboldi Italy

Oren Tsur Israel

Alexandra Olteanu United States

Isabel M. Kloumann United States

Catherine A. Bliss

313 ×0.9

SNP

363 ×1.1

AI

313 ×1.3

SPS

207 ×1.4

SP

81 ×0.8

IS

Citations per year, relative to Catherine A. Bliss Catherine A. Bliss (= 1×) peers Isabel M. Kloumann

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine A. Bliss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine A. Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine A. Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine A. Bliss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine A. Bliss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine A. Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine A. Bliss. The network helps show where Catherine A. Bliss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine A. Bliss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine A. Bliss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine A. Bliss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine A. Bliss. Catherine A. Bliss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Bliss, Catherine A., Morgan R. Frank, Christopher M. Danforth, & Peter Sheridan Dodds. (2014). An evolutionary algorithm approach to link prediction in dynamic social networks. Journal of Computational Science. 5(5). 750–764. 171 indexed citations

2.

Bliss, Catherine A., Christopher M. Danforth, & Peter Sheridan Dodds. (2014). Estimation of Global Network Statistics from Incomplete Data. PLoS ONE. 9(10). e108471–e108471. 23 indexed citations

3.

Bliss, Catherine A., et al.. (2013). cMOOCs and Global Learning: An Authentic Alternative. Online Learning. 17(2). 61 indexed citations

4.

Kloumann, Isabel M., Christopher M. Danforth, Kameron Decker Harris, Catherine A. Bliss, & Peter Sheridan Dodds. (2012). Positivity of the English Language. PLoS ONE. 7(1). e29484–e29484. 84 indexed citations

5.

Bliss, Catherine A., Isabel M. Kloumann, Kameron Decker Harris, Christopher M. Danforth, & Peter Sheridan Dodds. (2012). Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness. Journal of Computational Science. 3(5). 388–397. 91 indexed citations

6.

Dodds, Peter Sheridan, Kameron Decker Harris, Isabel M. Kloumann, Catherine A. Bliss, & Christopher M. Danforth. (2011). Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE. 6(12). e26752–e26752. 519 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact