Cath Neal

1.4k total citations
12 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Cath Neal is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cath Neal has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Archeology, 4 papers in Paleontology and 4 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Cath Neal's work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (4 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers). Cath Neal is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (4 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers). Cath Neal collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sri Lanka. Cath Neal's co-authors include Simon James Price, Jonathan R. Ford, A.H. Cooper, Matt Edgeworth, Colin N. Waters, P. K. Haff, Dan Richter, Philip L. Gibbard, Michael A. Ellis and Erle C. Ellis and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment.

In The Last Decade

Cath Neal

12 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Cath Neal

AS

PALEO

GPC

ECOLO

ARCHE

Wiebke Bebermeier Germany

Veronica Chiarini Italy

Michaël Schmidt Germany

Peter Bush United Kingdom

Claire Rambeau France

Yongchong Lin China

Philip E. van Beynen United States

Daniel Ballesteros Spain

Jonas Satkūnas Lithuania

Jan Rodzik Poland

Wiebke Bebermeier Germany

Cath Neal

45 ×0.5

AS

44 ×0.8

PALEO

82 ×1.7

GPC

21 ×0.5

ECOLO

48 ×1.3

ARCHE

Citations per year, relative to Cath Neal Cath Neal (= 1×) peers Wiebke Bebermeier

Countries citing papers authored by Cath Neal

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cath Neal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cath Neal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cath Neal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cath Neal

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cath Neal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cath Neal. The network helps show where Cath Neal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cath Neal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cath Neal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cath Neal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cath Neal. Cath Neal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Neal, Cath, et al.. (2023). Red blood cell alloantibodies in the context of critical bleeding and massive transfusion.. PubMed. 21(5). 390–399. 2 indexed citations

2.

Neal, Cath, et al.. (2020). Landscape and Settlement in the Vale of York : Archaeological investigations at Heslington East, York, 2003–13. 2 indexed citations

3.

Edgeworth, Matt, Erle C. Ellis, Philip L. Gibbard, Cath Neal, & Michael A. Ellis. (2019). The chronostratigraphic method is unsuitable for determining the start of the Anthropocene. Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment. 43(3). 334–344. 25 indexed citations

4.

Edgeworth, Matt, Dan Richter, Colin N. Waters, et al.. (2015). Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene: The lower bounding surface of anthropogenic deposits. The Anthropocene Review. 2(1). 33–58. 98 indexed citations

5.

Neal, Cath. (2015). Know your place? Evaluating the therapeutic benefits of engagement with historic landscapes. Cultural Trends. 24(2). 133–142. 4 indexed citations

6.

Neal, Cath, et al.. (2014). Engaging Communities in the ‘Big Society’: What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology?. The Historic Environment Policy & Practice. 5(1). 74–88. 10 indexed citations

7.

Neal, Cath. (2014). The Potential of Integrated Urban Deposit Modelling as a Cultural Heritage Planning Tool. Planning Practice and Research. 29(3). 256–267. 4 indexed citations

8.

Neal, Cath, et al.. (2013). A Late Roman Well at Heslington East, York: ritual or routine practices?. Internet Archaeology. 6 indexed citations

9.

Neal, Cath, et al.. (2013). Authority and Community: Reflections on Archaeological Practice at Heslington East, York. The Historic Environment Policy & Practice. 4(2). 139–155. 6 indexed citations

10.

Turner, Sam, et al.. (2012). Early Medieval Settlement at Mothecombe, Devon: The Interaction of Local, Regional and Long-Distance Dynamics. Archaeological Journal. 169(1). 343–394. 3 indexed citations

11.

Price, Simon James, Jonathan R. Ford, A.H. Cooper, & Cath Neal. (2011). Humans as major geological and geomorphological agents in the Anthropocene: the significance of artificial ground in Great Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 369(1938). 1056–1084. 154 indexed citations

12.

Neal, Cath. (2006). Dry Valley Research: a Case Study from the Yorkshire Wolds. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(0). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact