Caroline Hurley

646 total citations
10 papers, 73 citations indexed

About

Caroline Hurley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Hurley has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 73 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Caroline Hurley's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). Caroline Hurley is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). Caroline Hurley collaborates with scholars based in Ireland and United Kingdom. Caroline Hurley's co-authors include Mike Clarke, Frances Shiely, Patricia M. Kearney, Joseph A. Eustace, J. R. Power, Evelyn Flanagan, Carol Sinnott, William J Cragg, Sally Stenning and Martin P. Davoren and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Sexually Transmitted Infections and Trials.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Hurley

9 papers receiving 71 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caroline Hurley Ireland 5 33 31 24 21 8 10 73
Carlos Díaz-Montaña United Kingdom 5 38 1.2× 27 0.9× 34 1.4× 32 1.5× 21 2.6× 9 86
Nicola Joffe United Kingdom 4 59 1.8× 46 1.5× 40 1.7× 48 2.3× 5 0.6× 6 98
Véronique Wilson United States 2 22 0.7× 26 0.8× 19 0.8× 35 1.7× 5 0.6× 4 66
Siobhán Gaynor United Kingdom 2 34 1.0× 7 0.2× 16 0.7× 7 0.3× 14 1.8× 4 61
Matthew J. Chiovitti Canada 4 13 0.4× 15 0.5× 10 0.4× 4 0.2× 10 1.3× 6 46
Inhye Kim South Korea 4 5 0.2× 20 0.6× 15 0.6× 6 0.3× 9 1.1× 9 46
John C. Wakefield Hong Kong 5 3 0.1× 13 0.4× 24 1.0× 51 2.4× 3 0.4× 14 114
Frank Ruschitzka Switzerland 3 12 0.4× 43 1.4× 7 0.3× 1 0.0× 6 0.8× 7 82
Ala Taji Heravi Switzerland 4 13 0.4× 10 0.3× 10 0.4× 4 0.2× 1 0.1× 8 35
Lina Ghosn France 5 10 0.3× 23 0.7× 14 0.6× 1 0.0× 17 2.1× 8 83

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Hurley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Hurley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Hurley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Hurley. The network helps show where Caroline Hurley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Hurley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Hurley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Hurley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Hurley. Caroline Hurley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
O’Donnell, Kate, Martin P. Davoren, Fiona Lyons, et al.. (2022). Hepatitis A and B vaccination in gbMSM in Ireland: findings from the European MSM Internet Survey 2017 (EMIS-2017). Sexually Transmitted Infections. 99(5). 337–345. 3 indexed citations
2.
Cragg, William J, et al.. (2021). Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: A scoping review. Clinical Trials. 18(2). 245–259. 6 indexed citations
5.
Organ, Damien, Caroline Hurley, Ciara Heavin, et al.. (2018). A Systematic Review of User-Centred Design Practices in Illicit Substance Use Interventions for Higher Education Students. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 192. 5 indexed citations
6.
Hurley, Caroline, Carol Sinnott, Mike Clarke, et al.. (2017). Perceived barriers and facilitators to Risk Based Monitoring in academic-led clinical trials: a mixed methods study. Trials. 18(1). 423–423. 20 indexed citations
7.
Hurley, Caroline, et al.. (2017). Study within a trial (SWAT) protocol. Participants' perspectives and preferences on clinical trial result dissemination: The TRUST Thyroid Trial experience. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 7. 163–165. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hurley, Caroline, Frances Shiely, J. R. Power, et al.. (2016). Risk based monitoring (RBM) tools for clinical trials: A systematic review. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 51. 15–27. 30 indexed citations
9.
Hurley, Caroline, et al.. (2014). Comparison of occupational radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging with Rb-82 PET and Tc-99m SPECT. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 35(10). 1032–1037. 4 indexed citations
10.
Hurley, Caroline, et al.. (2013). Natterjack toad monitoring project, 2011-2012. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026