Caroline Cobb

474 total citations
15 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Caroline Cobb is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Cobb has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ophthalmology, 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Caroline Cobb's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (12 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). Caroline Cobb is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (12 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). Caroline Cobb collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Portugal. Caroline Cobb's co-authors include C J MacEwen, Roshini Sanders, Suparno Chakrabarti, Vikas Chadha, Karen Russell, Simon Ogston, Andrew T. Cox, Emanuele Trucco, Karim F. Damji and Ahti Tarkkanen and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Eye.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Cobb

15 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Caroline Cobb
Caroline Cobb
Citations per year, relative to Caroline Cobb Caroline Cobb (= 1×) peers Grażyna Malukiewicz

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Cobb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Cobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Cobb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Cobb. The network helps show where Caroline Cobb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Cobb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Cobb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Cobb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Cobb. Caroline Cobb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Cobb, Caroline, et al.. (2024). Patient information videos via QR codes: An innovative and sustainable approach in ophthalmology. Scottish Medical Journal. 69(2). 45–52. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pinto, Luís Abegão, Carlo Alberto Cutolo, Yue Shi, et al.. (2021). On Clinical Agreement on the Visibility and Extent of Anatomical Layers in Digital Gonio Photographs. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 10(11). 1–1. 9 indexed citations
3.
Pinto, Luís Abegão, et al.. (2021). Semantic segmentation of gonio-photographs via adaptive ROI localisation and uncertainty estimation. BMJ Open Ophthalmology. 6(1). e000898–e000898. 5 indexed citations
4.
Shamdas, Mohith, et al.. (2020). Plasma fibroblast skin tightening treatment resulting in bilateral chemical eye injury secondary to EMLA cream: a case report. BMC Ophthalmology. 20(1). 342–342. 2 indexed citations
5.
Manivannan, Siyamalan, Caroline Cobb, Stephen Burgess, & Emanuele Trucco. (2017). Subcategory Classifiers for Multiple-Instance Learning and Its Application to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Visibility Classification. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 36(5). 1140–1150. 14 indexed citations
6.
Ogston, Simon, et al.. (2014). Recent trends in glaucoma surgery in Scotland, England and Wales. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 99(3). 308–312. 40 indexed citations
7.
Giachetti, Andrea, Khai Sing Chin, Emanuele Trucco, Caroline Cobb, & Peter J. Wilson. (2011). Multiresolution localization and segmentation of the optical disc in fundus images using inpainted background and vessel information. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 6512. 2145–2148. 16 indexed citations
8.
Welch, Julia D, et al.. (2010). Glaucoma surgery: trainee outcomes and implications for future training: southeast Scotland. Eye. 24(11). 1700–1707. 13 indexed citations
9.
Aragon-Martin, José Antonio, Robert Ritch, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of LOXL1 gene polymorphisms in exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma.. PubMed. 14. 533–41. 75 indexed citations
10.
Cobb, Caroline, Suparno Chakrabarti, Vikas Chadha, & Roshini Sanders. (2006). The effect of aspirin and warfarin therapy in trabeculectomy. Eye. 21(5). 598–603. 45 indexed citations
11.
Imrie, Fraser, et al.. (2005). Glaucoma electronic patient record—design, experience and study of high-risk patients. Eye. 19(9). 956–962. 9 indexed citations
12.
Cackett, Peter, et al.. (2005). South-East Scotland trabeculectomy survey. Eye. 21(1). 46–51. 9 indexed citations
13.
Cobb, Caroline. (2004). Exfoliation syndrome angle characteristics: a lack of correlation with amount of disc damage. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 88(8). 1002–1003. 12 indexed citations
14.
15.
Cobb, Caroline, Karen Russell, Andrew T. Cox, & C J MacEwen. (2002). Factors influencing visual outcome in anisometropic amblyopes. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 86(11). 1278–1281. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026