Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices
Citations per year, relative to Carla O’Dell Carla O’Dell (= 1×)
peers
Donald Hislop
Countries citing papers authored by Carla O’Dell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Carla O’Dell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carla O’Dell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carla O’Dell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carla O’Dell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carla O’Dell. The network helps show where Carla O’Dell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carla O’Dell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carla O’Dell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carla O’Dell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carla O’Dell. Carla O’Dell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (2004). The Executive's Role in Knowledge Management. Medical Entomology and Zoology.21 indexed citations
2.
McDermott, Richard & Carla O’Dell. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management. 5(1). 76–85.761 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (2000). Knowledge Management: A Guide for Your Journey to Best-Practice Processes. Medical Entomology and Zoology.15 indexed citations
4.
Elliott, Susan J. & Carla O’Dell. (1999). Sharing knowledge and best practices: the hows and whys of tapping your organization's hidden reservoirs of knowledge.. PubMed. 42(3). 34–7.27 indexed citations
O’Dell, Carla & Celene Grayson. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices. California Management Review. 40(3). 154–174.1010 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: The Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice. Medical Entomology and Zoology.365 indexed citations
9.
O’Dell, Carla. (1993). Benchmarking. Building on received wisdom.. PubMed. 36(1). 17–8, 20.2 indexed citations
10.
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (1991). Американский менеджмент на пороге XXI века.
11.
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (1988). American Business: A Two-Minute Warning: Ten Changes Managers Must Make to Survive Into the 21st Century. Medical Entomology and Zoology.21 indexed citations
12.
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (1988). Flex Your Pay Muscle. Compensation & Benefits Review. 20(5). 69–75.2 indexed citations
O’Dell, Carla, et al.. (1986). People, performance, and pay : a full report on the American Productivity Center/American Compensation Association national survey of non-traditional reward and human resource practices. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
15.
O’Dell, Carla. (1981). Gainsharing: Involvement, Incentives, and Productivity. Medical Entomology and Zoology.8 indexed citations
16.
Hintzman, Douglas L., et al.. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology. 13(2). 149–206.179 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.