Candy Rowe

5.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
66 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Candy Rowe is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Candy Rowe has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 16 papers in Ecology and 15 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Candy Rowe's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (41 papers), Plant and animal studies (39 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (13 papers). Candy Rowe is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (41 papers), Plant and animal studies (39 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (13 papers). Candy Rowe collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Candy Rowe's co-authors include John Skelhorn, Susan D. Healy, Tim Guilford, Christina G. Halpin, Melissa Bateson, Leena Lindström, Craig A. Barnett, Anne Lyytinen, Peter K. McGregor and Paul Flecknell and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Candy Rowe

66 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent s... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Candy Rowe United Kingdom 34 2.9k 920 726 678 647 66 3.8k
Elizabeth A. Tibbetts United States 34 2.9k 1.0× 2.0k 2.2× 483 0.7× 614 0.9× 469 0.7× 96 3.7k
Richard G. Coss United States 38 1.7k 0.6× 693 0.8× 1.4k 1.9× 1.1k 1.6× 681 1.1× 102 4.4k
Michael P. Speed United Kingdom 35 4.3k 1.5× 1.7k 1.9× 965 1.3× 363 0.5× 199 0.3× 80 5.2k
Indriķis Krams Latvia 41 2.3k 0.8× 551 0.6× 1.5k 2.1× 412 0.6× 676 1.0× 153 4.3k
Molly E. Cummings United States 34 2.5k 0.8× 584 0.6× 507 0.7× 481 0.7× 300 0.5× 79 3.4k
Lauren A. O’Connell United States 28 1.3k 0.5× 555 0.6× 465 0.6× 1.6k 2.3× 302 0.5× 90 3.4k
Eileen A. Hebets United States 38 4.1k 1.4× 2.7k 2.9× 587 0.8× 303 0.4× 1.1k 1.7× 145 5.1k
Donna L. Maney United States 35 2.9k 1.0× 691 0.8× 2.0k 2.8× 782 1.2× 1.2k 1.8× 83 5.3k
Elizabeth Adkins–Regan United States 38 2.9k 1.0× 610 0.7× 1.3k 1.9× 1.0k 1.5× 1.3k 2.0× 115 4.4k
James Dale New Zealand 25 2.3k 0.8× 575 0.6× 1.1k 1.6× 329 0.5× 565 0.9× 56 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Candy Rowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candy Rowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candy Rowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candy Rowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candy Rowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candy Rowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candy Rowe. The network helps show where Candy Rowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Candy Rowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Candy Rowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Candy Rowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Candy Rowe. Candy Rowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wahl‐Jorgensen, Karin & Candy Rowe. (2024). Time Poverty and its Impact on Research Culture. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(3). 205–217. 1 indexed citations
2.
Penacchio, Olivier, Christina G. Halpin, Innes C. Cuthill, et al.. (2023). A computational neuroscience framework for quantifying warning signals. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 15(1). 103–116. 5 indexed citations
3.
Leach, Matthew C., et al.. (2020). Negative mood affects the expression of negative but not positive emotions in mice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1933). 9 indexed citations
4.
Halpin, Christina G., Olivier Penacchio, P. George Lovell, et al.. (2020). Pattern contrast influences wariness in naïve predators towards aposematic patterns. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 9246–9246. 23 indexed citations
5.
Dwyer, Dominic M., et al.. (2018). Handling method alters the hedonic value of reward in laboratory mice. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 2448–2448. 62 indexed citations
6.
Rowe, Candy, et al.. (2018). Testing the feasibility of the startle-first route to deimatism. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 10737–10737. 17 indexed citations
7.
Read, Jenny C. A., et al.. (2017). Unravelling the illusion of flicker fusion. Biology Letters. 13(2). 20160831–20160831. 29 indexed citations
8.
Gray, Helen, Bradley D. Pearce, Alexander Thiele, & Candy Rowe. (2017). The use of preferred social stimuli as rewards for rhesus macaques in behavioural neuroscience. PLoS ONE. 12(5). e0178048–e0178048. 6 indexed citations
9.
Halpin, Christina G., John Skelhorn, Candy Rowe, Graeme D. Ruxton, & Andrew D. Higginson. (2017). The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics. PLoS ONE. 12(1). e0169043–e0169043. 6 indexed citations
10.
Skelhorn, John & Candy Rowe. (2016). Cognition and the evolution of camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 283(1825). 20152890–20152890. 58 indexed citations
11.
Gray, Helen, et al.. (2016). Physiological, Behavioral, and Scientific Impact of Different Fluid Control Protocols in the Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta). eNeuro. 3(4). ENEURO.0195–16.2016. 30 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Karen E., Christina G. Halpin, & Candy Rowe. (2016). The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size. Behavioral Ecology. 27(6). arw086–arw086. 17 indexed citations
13.
Barnett, Craig A., Melissa Bateson, & Candy Rowe. (2014). Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive. Biology Letters. 10(11). 20140533–20140533. 30 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Karen E., Christina G. Halpin, & Candy Rowe. (2014). Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning. Behavioural Processes. 109. 173–179. 19 indexed citations
15.
Rowe, Candy & Susan D. Healy. (2014). Measuring variation in cognition. Behavioral Ecology. 25(6). 1287–1292. 218 indexed citations
16.
Chatelain, Marion, Christina G. Halpin, & Candy Rowe. (2013). Ambient temperature influences birds' decisions to eat toxic prey. Animal Behaviour. 86(4). 733–740. 41 indexed citations
17.
Skelhorn, John & Candy Rowe. (2007). Predators' Toxin Burdens Influence Their Strategic Decisions to Eat Toxic Prey. Current Biology. 17(17). 1479–1483. 95 indexed citations
18.
Skelhorn, John, et al.. (2007). Colour biases are more than a question of taste. Animal Behaviour. 75(3). 827–835. 29 indexed citations
19.
Gonzalez, Andrew, et al.. (1995). Flower choice by honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): sex-phase of flowers and preferences among nectar and pollen foragers. Oecologia. 101(2). 258–264. 41 indexed citations
20.
Lessells, C. M., Candy Rowe, & Peter K. McGregor. (1995). Individual and sex differences in the provisioning calls of European bee-eaters. Animal Behaviour. 49(1). 244–247. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026