Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Post‐acute COVID‐19 syndrome (PCS) and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL)—A systematic review and meta‐analysis
2021383 citationsPreeti Malik, Karan Patel et al.Journal of Medical Virologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Cândida Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cândida Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cândida Pinto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cândida Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cândida Pinto. The network helps show where Cândida Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cândida Pinto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cândida Pinto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cândida Pinto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cândida Pinto. Cândida Pinto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pinto, Cândida, et al.. (2021). Nursing strategies to support psychological adaptation in adult cancer patients: a scoping review. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).5 indexed citations
5.
Malik, Preeti, Karan Patel, Cândida Pinto, et al.. (2021). Post‐acute COVID‐19 syndrome (PCS) and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL)—A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Medical Virology. 94(1). 253–262.383 indexed citations breakdown →
Pires, Rita Gomes Wanderley, Margarida Reis Santos, & Cândida Pinto. (2020). Perceção dos pais sobre o futuro da criança com cancro. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 458–463.
11.
Lima, Lígia, et al.. (2018). Nurses’ coping with the unexpected death of children and adolescents. Repositório Comum (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal). 19. 52.
Pinto, Cândida, et al.. (2013). Ser padre y ser madre en la actualidad: repensar los cuidados de enfermería en el puerperio. 14(2). 45–51.1 indexed citations
Pinto, Cândida & José Luís Pais Ribeiro. (2010). Avaliação da espiritualidade dos sobreviventes de cancro: implicações na qualidade de vida. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública. 28(1). 49–56.10 indexed citations
16.
Ribeiro, José Luís Pais, Cândida Pinto, & Célia Santos. (2008). VALIDATION STUDY OF THE PORTUGUESE VERSION OF THE QLC-C30-V.3. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 9(1). 89–102.40 indexed citations
17.
Pinto, Cândida & José Luís Pais Ribeiro. (2007). Sobrevivente de cancro: uma outra realidade!. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
18.
Pinto, Cândida & José Luís Pais Ribeiro. (2007). Construção de uma escala de avaliação da espiritualidade em contextos de saúde. Repositório Comum (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal). 21(2). 47–53.42 indexed citations
19.
Pinto, Cândida & José Luís Pais Ribeiro. (2007). Construção de uma Escala de Avaliação da Espiritualidade em Contextos de Saúde = Development of a Scale for the Assessment of Spirituality in Health Settings. Open Repository of the University of Porto (University of Porto).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.