C. William Zanner

995 citations
19 papers · 815 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. William Zanner

19 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers

C. William Zanner
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Atmospheric Science 452
  • Earth-Surface Processes 161
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 99
  • Soil Science 138
  • Global and Planetary Change 294
Replace Xinwen Xu with:
Xinwen Xu China
Rupert Bäumler Germany
David A. Grimley United States
Leon R. Follmer United States
Fabiano do Nascimento Pupim Brazil
Geoff S. Humphreys Australia
H. Bakker Netherlands
René Boulet Brazil
André Eger New Zealand
Hongya Wang China
C. William Zanner relative to Xinwen Xu China Xinwen Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Xinwen Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Zanner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Zanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Zanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Zanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Zanner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Zanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Zanner. The network helps show where C. William Zanner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. William Zanner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Zanner Line = papers co-authored together C. William Zanner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2008220
2 2005116
3 2008102
4 199988
5 200663
6 200657
7 200451
8 200519
9 200818
10 199816
11 199512
12 200411
13 200710
14 20058
15 20057
16 20057
17
COMPARISON OF BOTANICAL COMPOSITION, SOIL CARBON CONTENT, AND ROOT DISTRIBUTION OF SUBIRRIGATED MEADOWS IN THE NEBRASKA SANDHILLS
20074
18 20053
19 20053

About C. William Zanner

C. William Zanner is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Molecular Biology, Soil Science, Civil and Structural Engineering and Geophysics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (3 papers), Geological formations and processes (2 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (452 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (161 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (99 citations), Soil Science (138 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (294 citations). C. William Zanner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. E. Geiss, David A. Wedin, Xuguo Zhou, Tala Awada, F. Edwin Harvey, Ramón Egli, Robert C. Graham, Joseph A. Mason, Richard A. Minnich and Edward A. Nater. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Southeastern geographer, Sedimentology and Geoderma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact