C. Tiburzi

7.6k total citations
34 papers, 422 citations indexed

About

C. Tiburzi is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Tiburzi has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 422 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 11 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in C. Tiburzi's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (25 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (14 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (11 papers). C. Tiburzi is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (25 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (14 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (11 papers). C. Tiburzi collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Netherlands. C. Tiburzi's co-authors include R. M. Shannon, M. Kerr, S. Johnston, M. Bailes, Andrea Possenti, W. van Straten, E. F. Keane, N. D. R. Bhat, M. Krämer and A. Jameson and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

C. Tiburzi

28 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Tiburzi Germany 12 409 108 81 38 35 34 422
F. Jankowski United Kingdom 11 483 1.2× 136 1.3× 77 1.0× 42 1.1× 30 0.9× 30 492
C. Sobey Australia 14 443 1.1× 149 1.4× 108 1.3× 47 1.2× 43 1.2× 20 450
R. Spiewak Australia 14 509 1.2× 121 1.1× 122 1.5× 45 1.2× 56 1.6× 24 523
M. Geyer South Africa 13 427 1.0× 118 1.1× 81 1.0× 32 0.8× 37 1.1× 31 437
M. E. Lower Australia 11 422 1.0× 91 0.8× 95 1.2× 75 2.0× 30 0.9× 31 426
M. B. Mickaliger United Kingdom 9 365 0.9× 68 0.6× 51 0.6× 65 1.7× 28 0.8× 25 373
D. Perrodin Italy 9 289 0.7× 115 1.1× 44 0.5× 32 0.8× 36 1.0× 19 300
L S Oswald United Kingdom 11 318 0.8× 92 0.9× 102 1.3× 36 0.9× 26 0.7× 25 334
D. C. Sheppard Australia 2 353 0.9× 127 1.2× 75 0.9× 33 0.9× 25 0.7× 2 366
A. Corongiu Italy 11 619 1.5× 254 2.4× 113 1.4× 50 1.3× 45 1.3× 29 666

Countries citing papers authored by C. Tiburzi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Tiburzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Tiburzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Tiburzi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Tiburzi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Tiburzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Tiburzi. The network helps show where C. Tiburzi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Tiburzi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Tiburzi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Tiburzi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Tiburzi. C. Tiburzi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Susarla, S. C., D. J. McKenna, E. F. Keane, et al.. (2025). Long-term timing results of ecliptic pulsars observed with I-LOFAR. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 698. A248–A248. 1 indexed citations
2.
Iraci, F., A. Chalumeau, C. Tiburzi, et al.. (2024). Pulsar timing methods for evaluating dispersion measure time series. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 692. A170–A170. 2 indexed citations
3.
Liu, Kuo, A. Parthasarathy, M. J. Keith, et al.. (2024). The impact on astrometry by solar-wind effect in pulsar timing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 536(3). 2603–2617.
4.
Bailes, M., E. F. Keane, M. Krämer, et al.. (2024). Eighteen new fast radio bursts in the High Time Resolution Universe survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 690. A204–A204.
5.
Grießmeier, J.‐M., I. Cognard, Robert Main, et al.. (2024). The NenuFAR Pulsar Blind Survey (NPBS): I. Survey overview, expectations, and first redetections. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 693. A96–A96.
6.
Porayko, N. K., M. Mevius, Manuel Hernández Pajares, et al.. (2023). Validation of global ionospheric models using long-term observations of pulsar Faraday rotation with the LOFAR radio telescope. Journal of Geodesy. 97(12). 3 indexed citations
7.
Forte, Biagio, R. A. Fallows, Kacper Kotulak, et al.. (2023). Towards the possibility to combine LOFAR and GNSS measurements to sense ionospheric irregularities. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 13. 27–27.
8.
Posselt, B., A. Karastergiou, S. Johnston, et al.. (2022). The Thousand Pulsar Array program on MeerKAT – IX. The time-averaged properties of the observed pulsar population. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(3). 4582–4600. 28 indexed citations
9.
Wu, Ziwei, J. P. W. Verbiest, Robert Main, et al.. (2022). Pulsar scintillation studies with LOFAR. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 663. A116–A116. 17 indexed citations
10.
Fallows, R. A., Biagio Forte, M. Mevius, et al.. (2022). The scintillating tail of comet C/2020 F3 (Neowise). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 667. A57–A57.
11.
Sobey, C., C. Bassa, S. P. O’Sullivan, et al.. (2022). Searching for pulsars associated with polarised point sources using LOFAR: Initial discoveries from the TULIPP project. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 661. A87–A87. 12 indexed citations
12.
Wang, J., G. Shaifullah, J. P. W. Verbiest, et al.. (2021). A comparative analysis of pulse time-of-arrival creation methods. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 658. A181–A181. 6 indexed citations
13.
D’Avanzo, P., A. Ridolfi, F. Coti Zelati, et al.. (2021). Evidence of intra-binary shock emission from the redback pulsar PSR J1048+2339. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 649. A120–A120. 5 indexed citations
14.
Tiburzi, C., et al.. (2021). The polarisation of the drifting sub-pulses from PSR B1919+21. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 657. A34–A34. 6 indexed citations
15.
Shaifullah, G., C. Tiburzi, & Pietro Zucca. (2020). CMEchaser, Detecting Line-of-Sight Occultations Due to Coronal Mass Ejections. Solar Physics. 295(10). 5 indexed citations
16.
Shaifullah, G., C. Tiburzi, & Pietro Zucca. (2020). CMEchaser: Coronal Mass Ejection line-of-sight occultation detector. BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca). 1 indexed citations
17.
Tiburzi, C., J. P. W. Verbiest, G. Shaifullah, et al.. (2019). On the usefulness of existing solar wind models for pulsar timing corrections. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487(1). 394–408. 15 indexed citations
18.
Porayko, N. K., A. Noutsos, C. Tiburzi, et al.. (2018). Testing the accuracy of the ionospheric Faraday rotation corrections through LOFAR observations of bright northern pulsars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 483(3). 4100–4113. 15 indexed citations
19.
Shannon, R. M., M. Bailes, K. W. Bannister, et al.. (2016). The magnetic field and turbulence of the cosmic web measured using a brilliant fast radio burst. Science. 354(6317). 1249–1252. 110 indexed citations
20.
Tiburzi, C., G. Hobbs, M. Kerr, et al.. (2015). A study of spatial correlations in pulsar timing array data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 455(4). 4339–4350. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026