Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale
2016329 citationsJohn W. Redhead, C. Stratford et al.The Science of The Total Environmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Stratford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Stratford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Stratford more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Stratford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Stratford. The network helps show where C. Stratford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Stratford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Stratford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Stratford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Stratford. C. Stratford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stratford, C., Julie Z. Miller, Alan House, et al.. (2017). Do trees in UK-relevant river catchments influence fluvial flood peaks?: a systematic review. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).13 indexed citations
2.
Redhead, John W., C. Stratford, Katrina Sharps, et al.. (2016). Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale. The Science of The Total Environment. 569-570. 1418–1426.329 indexed citations breakdown →
Piniewski, Mikołaj, et al.. (2011). Estimation of environmental flows in semi-natural lowland rivers - the Narew basin case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 20(5).13 indexed citations
8.
Acreman, Mike, J. R. Blake, Owen Mountford, et al.. (2011). Guidance on using wetland sensitivity to climate changetool-kit. A contribution to the Wetland Vision Partnership.1 indexed citations
9.
Davy, A. J., et al.. (2010). Protecting the Plant Communities and Rare Species of Dune Wetland Systems: Ecohydrological Guidelines for Wet Dune Habitats Phase 2. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).10 indexed citations
10.
Piniewski, Mikołaj, et al.. (2010). SCENES: water SCenarios for Europe and NEighbouring States. Report D4.5 Estimation of environmental flows, using an adapted building block methodology, on all the major reaches of the Narew River. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).1 indexed citations
11.
Acreman, Mike, et al.. (2010). Restoration of wet grasslands through re-instatement of surface grips. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.