C. O’Connell

976 total citations
25 papers, 518 citations indexed

About

C. O’Connell is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, C. O’Connell has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 518 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 13 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 12 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in C. O’Connell's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (16 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (13 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (10 papers). C. O’Connell is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (16 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (13 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (10 papers). C. O’Connell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. C. O’Connell's co-authors include Chengkun Huang, W. B. Mori, P. Muggli, Mark Hogan, R. Siemann, K. A. Marsh, C. E. Clayton, D. Walz, F.-J. Decker and R. Iverson and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics of Plasmas and Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams.

In The Last Decade

C. O’Connell

22 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. O’Connell United States 9 471 219 182 182 172 25 518
R. Iverson United States 10 507 1.1× 235 1.1× 180 1.0× 181 1.0× 175 1.0× 25 561
N. Barov United States 13 465 1.0× 300 1.4× 188 1.0× 285 1.6× 232 1.3× 39 609
I. Blumenfeld United States 7 537 1.1× 342 1.6× 153 0.8× 269 1.5× 214 1.2× 16 670
Weiming An United States 15 608 1.3× 348 1.6× 150 0.8× 219 1.2× 190 1.1× 51 675
Franz-Josef Decker United States 7 416 0.9× 250 1.1× 130 0.7× 187 1.0× 133 0.8× 28 533
E. Öz United States 9 712 1.5× 334 1.5× 227 1.2× 269 1.5× 225 1.3× 33 791
S. Deng United States 8 302 0.6× 132 0.6× 115 0.6× 100 0.5× 109 0.6× 22 335
H. Figueroa United States 7 275 0.6× 126 0.6× 155 0.9× 218 1.2× 72 0.4× 15 373
Timon Mehrling Germany 11 369 0.8× 189 0.9× 86 0.5× 91 0.5× 170 1.0× 30 399
Sam Barber United States 11 242 0.5× 212 1.0× 75 0.4× 189 1.0× 100 0.6× 31 368

Countries citing papers authored by C. O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. O’Connell. The network helps show where C. O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. O’Connell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. O’Connell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. O’Connell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. O’Connell. C. O’Connell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hartnett, Gavin S., et al.. (2022). Operational Feasibility of Adversarial Attacks Against Artificial Intelligence. RAND Corporation eBooks.
2.
Muggli, P., B. E. Blue, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2008). Halo Formation and Emittance Growth of Positron Beams in Plasmas. Physical Review Letters. 101(5). 55001–55001. 36 indexed citations
3.
O’Connell, C., C. Barnes, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2006). Plasma production via field ionization. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 9(10). 30 indexed citations
4.
Marsh, K. A., C. E. Clayton, D. Johnson, et al.. (2006). Beam Matching to a Plasma Wake Field Accelerator using a Ramped Density Profile at the Plasma Boundary. Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference. 2702–2704. 16 indexed citations
5.
Deng, S., C. Barnes, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2006). Hose Instability and Wake Generation by an Intense Electron Beam in a Self-Ionized Gas. Physical Review Letters. 96(4). 45001–45001. 12 indexed citations
6.
O’Connell, C., C. Barnes, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2006). Field Ionization of Neutral Lithium Vapor Using A 28.5 GeV Electron Beam. Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference. 64. 1904–1906. 1 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, D., C. E. Clayton, C. Huang, et al.. (2006). Positron Source from Betatron X-Rays Emitted in a Plasma Wiggler. Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference. 1625–1627. 3 indexed citations
8.
Hogan, Mark, C. Barnes, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2005). Multi-GeV Energy Gain in a Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator. Physical Review Letters. 95(5). 54802–54802. 120 indexed citations
9.
Blue, B. E., P. Muggli, Mark Hogan, et al.. (2004). Plasma wakefield acceleration of an intense positron beam: correlation between time-resolved and time integrated energy diagnostics. 3. 1864–1866. 1 indexed citations
10.
Barnes, C., C. O’Connell, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2004). Improvements for the third generation plasma wakefield experiment E-164 at SLAC. 3. 1530–1532.
11.
Deng, S., C. Barnes, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2004). Modeling of beam-ionized sources for plasma accelerators. 3. 1933–1935. 1 indexed citations
12.
Bane, K., F.-J. Decker, P. Emma, et al.. (2004). Measurement of the longitudinal wakefield in the SLAC Linac for extremely short bunches. 5. 3126–3128. 2 indexed citations
13.
Krejcik, P., F.-J. Decker, P. Emma, et al.. (2004). Commissioning of the SPPS linac bunch compressor. 423–425. 7 indexed citations
14.
Marsh, K. A., B. E. Blue, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2004). Positron beam propagation in a meter long plasma channel. 5. 731–733. 2 indexed citations
15.
Muggli, P., B. E. Blue, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2004). Meter-Scale Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator Driven by a Matched Electron Beam. Physical Review Letters. 93(1). 68 indexed citations
16.
Blue, B. E., C. E. Clayton, C. O’Connell, et al.. (2003). Plasma-Wakefield Acceleration of an Intense Positron Beam. Physical Review Letters. 90(21). 214801–214801. 80 indexed citations
17.
Hogan, Mark, C. E. Clayton, Chengkun Huang, et al.. (2003). Ultrarelativistic-Positron-Beam Transport through Meter-Scale Plasmas. Physical Review Letters. 90(20). 205002–205002. 50 indexed citations
18.
Deng, S., C. Barnes, C. E. Clayton, et al.. (2003). Plasma wakefield acceleration in self-ionized gas or plasmas. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 68(4). 47401–47401. 8 indexed citations
19.
Emma, P., F.J. Decker, P. Krejcik, et al.. (2003). Measurements of transverse emittance growth due to coherent synchrotron radiation in the SLAC SPPS bunch compressor Chicane. 3129–3131. 1 indexed citations
20.
O’Connell, C., F.-J. Decker, Mark Hogan, et al.. (2002). Publisher’s Note: Dynamic focusing of an electron beam through a long plasma [Phys. Rev. ST Accel. BeamsPRABFM1098-44025, 121301 (2002)]. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 5(12). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026