C. Mühle

636 total citations
22 papers, 148 citations indexed

About

C. Mühle is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Mühle has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 148 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 16 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in C. Mühle's work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (16 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (10 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (9 papers). C. Mühle is often cited by papers focused on Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (16 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (10 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (9 papers). C. Mühle collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and United States. C. Mühle's co-authors include P. Spädtke, G. Moritz, G. Zschornack, G. Shirkov, M. Schädel, E. Schimpf, W. Brüchle, E. Jäger, Α. Türler and A. Yakushev and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

In The Last Decade

C. Mühle

20 papers receiving 131 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Mühle Germany	6	79	75	74	38	30	22	148
Antoine Chancé France	7	42 0.5×	54 0.7×	79 1.1×	30 0.8×	42 1.4×	28	126
А. С. Белов Russia	8	76 1.0×	70 0.9×	78 1.1×	68 1.8×	26 0.9×	35	163
T. Asaka Japan	7	68 0.9×	106 1.4×	39 0.5×	66 1.7×	22 0.7×	48	151
L. Snydstrup United States	7	77 1.0×	72 1.0×	51 0.7×	28 0.7×	23 0.8×	24	144
G. Geschonke Switzerland	6	88 1.1×	87 1.2×	33 0.4×	48 1.3×	25 0.8×	24	123
V.V. Parkhomchuk Russia	7	77 1.0×	76 1.0×	54 0.7×	65 1.7×	34 1.1×	30	153
J. Krier Germany	8	64 0.8×	46 0.6×	120 1.6×	44 1.2×	21 0.7×	21	164
S. Manikonda United States	7	42 0.5×	27 0.4×	71 1.0×	51 1.3×	23 0.8×	21	141
K. Zapfe Germany	7	71 0.9×	81 1.1×	57 0.8×	99 2.6×	43 1.4×	20	190
K. Yoshimura Japan	8	36 0.5×	30 0.4×	47 0.6×	31 0.8×	33 1.1×	37	172

Countries citing papers authored by C. Mühle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Mühle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Mühle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Mühle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Mühle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Mühle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Mühle. The network helps show where C. Mühle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Mühle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Mühle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Mühle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Mühle. C. Mühle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fils, J., P. Forck, K. Knie, et al.. (2019). Status of the FAIR Proton LINAC. JACOW. 787–789. 1 indexed citations

Mühle, C., et al.. (2018). Magnetic Septa for the SIS100 Accelerator at FAIR. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 28(3). 1–3.

Forck, P., L. Groening, K. Knie, et al.. (2017). Status of the FAIR pLinac. JACOW. 2208–2210.

Niebur, W., C. Mühle, P. K. Kurilkin, et al.. (2012). Design calculations for the superconducting dipole magnet for the Compressed Baryonic Matter (CBM) experiment at FAIR. GSI Repository (German Federal Government). 1 indexed citations

Semchenkov, A., W. Brüchle, E. Jäger, et al.. (2008). The TransActinide Separator and Chemistry Apparatus (TASCA) at GSI – Optimization of ion-optical structures and magnet designs. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 266(19-20). 4153–4161. 50 indexed citations

Köpf, U., et al.. (2007). Development of the injection- and extraction systems for the upgrade of SIS18. 27. 167–169. 1 indexed citations

Winkler, M., K.-H. Behr, H. Geißel, et al.. (2006). Radiation Resistant Quadrupole Magnet for the Super-FRS at FAIR. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 16(2). 415–418. 2 indexed citations

Schlitt, B., et al.. (2004). Status of the 7 MeV/u, 217 MHz Injector Linac for the Heidelberg Cancer Therapy Facility. 2 indexed citations

Fischer, Egbert, et al.. (2004). Investigation of the Power Losses in a Laminated Dipole Magnet With Superconducting Coils. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 14(2). 267–270. 12 indexed citations

10.

Zeller, A., et al.. (2003). Superferric magnets for the proposed international accelerator facility at GSI. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 13(2). 1339–1342. 1 indexed citations

11.

Langenbeck, B., et al.. (2002). A design for a wide-aperture 90° bending magnet for heavy-ion cancer therapy. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 12(1). 94–97. 2 indexed citations

12.

Spiller, P., J. Ahrens, Monika Emmerling, et al.. (2002). A new high-intensity synchrotron SIS100 with strong bunch compression for GSI. PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268). 5. 3278–3280. 2 indexed citations

13.

Spädtke, P. & C. Mühle. (2000). Simulation of ion extraction and beam transport (invited). Review of Scientific Instruments. 71(2). 820–825. 17 indexed citations

14.

Spädtke, P., H. Emig, C. Mühle, et al.. (1998). Ion source development at GSI. Review of Scientific Instruments. 69(2). 1079–1081. 7 indexed citations

15.

Spädtke, P., et al.. (1998). Ion sources for accelerators. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 139(1-4). 145–149. 4 indexed citations

16.

Mühle, C., et al.. (1998). Development of the Penning ionization gauge source for higher current. Review of Scientific Instruments. 69(2). 1057–1059. 2 indexed citations

17.

Mühle, C., et al.. (1996). Pulsed magnetic field-electron cyclotron resonance ion source operation. Review of Scientific Instruments. 67(3). 1331–1333. 4 indexed citations

18.

Mühle, C., et al.. (1994). Status of the pulsed magnetic field electron cyclotron resonance ion source. Review of Scientific Instruments. 65(4). 1078–1080. 4 indexed citations

19.

Zschornack, G., Dieter Hofmann, C. Mühle, et al.. (1992). A 14.6-GHz ECR ion source for atomic physics and materials research with highly charged slow ionsa). Review of Scientific Instruments. 63(5). 3078–3083. 1 indexed citations

20.

Shirkov, G., et al.. (1991). Ionization and charge dispersion in electron cyclotron resonance ion sources. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 302(1). 1–5. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact