Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Plant growth promoting rhizobia: challenges and opportunities
2014333 citationsSubramaniam Gopalakrishnan, Arumugam Sathya et al.3 Biotechprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by C. L. L. Gowda
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. L. Gowda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. L. Gowda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. L. Gowda more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. L. Gowda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. L. Gowda. The network helps show where C. L. L. Gowda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. L. L. Gowda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. L. L. Gowda.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. L. L. Gowda based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. L. L. Gowda. C. L. L. Gowda is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Monyo, E. S. & C. L. L. Gowda. (2014). Grain legumes strategies and seed roadmaps for select countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: Tropical Legumes II project report..2 indexed citations
Flowers, T. J., Pooran M. Gaur, C. L. L. Gowda, et al.. (2009). Salt sensitivity in chickpea. Plant Cell & Environment. 33(4). 490–509.192 indexed citations
12.
Gowda, C. L. L., P. Parthasarathy Rao, & S. Bhagavatula. (2009). Global trends in production and trade of major grainlegumes.10 indexed citations
13.
Reddy, B V S, et al.. (2006). Genetic resources enhancement of ICRISAT- mandate crops †. Current Science. 91(7). 880–884.11 indexed citations
14.
Reddy, B V S, S. Ramesh, & C. L. L. Gowda. (2005). Forging research and development partnerships with private sector at ICRISAT-sorghum as a case study.. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 1(1). 1–5.5 indexed citations
15.
Gowda, C. L. L., et al.. (2003). ICRISAT strengthens ties with private seed companies. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).4 indexed citations
16.
Joshi, P. K., P P Rao, C. L. L. Gowda, et al.. (2001). The World Chickpea and Pigeonpea Economies Facts, Trends, and Outlook. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).29 indexed citations
17.
Han, Tianfu, et al.. (2001). Legumes in rice-based cropping systems in tropical Asia: constraints and opportunities.. 42–61.19 indexed citations
18.
Gowda, C. L. L., et al.. (1996). Achieving high groundnut yields : proceedings of an international workshop, 25-29 August 1995, Shandong Peanut Research Institute (SPRI) Laixi,Shandong, China.4 indexed citations
19.
Gowda, C. L. L., et al.. (1990). Ten years of international trials and their lessons for the future.. 351–356.1 indexed citations
20.
Gowda, C. L. L., et al.. (1982). Pulses in Bangladesh..26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.