C. K. Young

444 total citations
10 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

C. K. Young is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. K. Young has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in C. K. Young's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers). C. K. Young is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers). C. K. Young collaborates with scholars based in China, Australia and United Kingdom. C. K. Young's co-authors include M. J. Currie, Hong Wu, Cai-Na Hao, Jianling Wang, Xiaoyang Xia, Chen Cao, Zugan Deng, Eduardo Hardy, M. J. Drinkwater and Jon M. Yearsley and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

C. K. Young

10 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. K. Young China 6 275 128 16 16 14 10 283
P. Rautiainen Finland 10 381 1.4× 170 1.3× 22 1.4× 19 1.2× 13 0.9× 19 386
Hong Bae Ann South Korea 11 316 1.1× 174 1.4× 7 0.4× 17 1.1× 25 1.8× 42 321
J. I. Davies United Kingdom 8 366 1.3× 166 1.3× 10 0.6× 21 1.3× 35 2.5× 14 371
Bernardo Cervantes Sodi Mexico 12 274 1.0× 179 1.4× 15 0.9× 8 0.5× 21 1.5× 28 287
D. Carter United Kingdom 13 419 1.5× 227 1.8× 8 0.5× 17 1.1× 28 2.0× 25 434
Daniel Christlein United States 9 380 1.4× 240 1.9× 14 0.9× 20 1.3× 28 2.0× 16 386
Craig S. Rudick United States 4 271 1.0× 185 1.4× 7 0.4× 12 0.8× 11 0.8× 4 274
R. Buta United States 10 346 1.3× 165 1.3× 24 1.5× 9 0.6× 17 1.2× 16 359
A. Mazure France 11 330 1.2× 201 1.6× 16 1.0× 12 0.8× 42 3.0× 21 337
G. Bothun United States 5 278 1.0× 158 1.2× 12 0.8× 24 1.5× 27 1.9× 5 280

Countries citing papers authored by C. K. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. K. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. K. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. K. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. K. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. K. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. K. Young. The network helps show where C. K. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. K. Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. K. Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. K. Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. K. Young. C. K. Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Young, C. K., et al.. (2008). A Critical Review of the Evidence for M32 being a Compact Dwarf Satellite of M31 rather than a More Distant Normal Galaxy. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 8(4). 369–384. 2 indexed citations
2.
Wu, Hong, Chen Cao, Cai-Na Hao, et al.. (2005). PAH and Mid-Infrared Luminosities as Measures of Star Formation Rate in Sp i t zer First Look Survey Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 632(2). L79–L82. 128 indexed citations
4.
5.
Young, C. K. & Zhengyi Shao. (2001). Total Magnitudes of Virgo Galaxies. II. An Investigation into the mp Scale of Volume I of Zwicky et al.'s Catalogue of Galaxies and of Clusters of Galaxies. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 18(2). 129–135. 1 indexed citations
6.
Young, C. K.. (2001). Total Magnitudes of Virgo Galaxies. I. Construction of a Self-Consistent Reference Dataset Spanning 8th to 18th Magnitude. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 18(2). 121–128. 2 indexed citations
7.
Young, C. K. & M. J. Currie. (1998). The "Virgo photometry catalogue”; a catalogue of 1180 galaxies in thedirection of the Virgo Cluster's core. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. 127(3). 367–395. 21 indexed citations
8.
Drinkwater, M. J., M. J. Currie, C. K. Young, Eduardo Hardy, & Jon M. Yearsley. (1996). Blue compact dwarf galaxies and new velocities in Virgo. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 279(2). 595–614. 14 indexed citations
9.
Young, C. K. & M. J. Currie. (1995). Distances to 64 Virgo dwarf-elliptical galaxies and the depth in their spatial distribution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 273(4). 1141–1149. 33 indexed citations
10.
Young, C. K. & M. J. Currie. (1994). A new extragalactic distance indicator based on the surface brightness profiles of dwarf elliptical galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 268(1). L11–L15. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026