C. Hintze

1.4k total citations
32 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

C. Hintze is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Hintze has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 17 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 11 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in C. Hintze's work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (16 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (14 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers). C. Hintze is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (16 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (14 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers). C. Hintze collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Slovakia. C. Hintze's co-authors include Michael Puderbach, Hans‐Ulrich Kauczor, Julien Dinkel, Monika Eichinger, Grzegorz Bauman, Jürgen Biederer, J. Biederer, Lothar R. Schad, Vladimı́r Jellúš and M. Deimling and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Radiology and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

C. Hintze

32 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Hintze Germany 12 638 602 415 116 106 32 1.0k
Grzegorz Bauman Switzerland 19 775 1.2× 919 1.5× 553 1.3× 194 1.7× 109 1.0× 71 1.3k
Jürgen Biederer Germany 22 804 1.3× 666 1.1× 946 2.3× 99 0.9× 151 1.4× 69 1.7k
Helen Marshall United Kingdom 25 785 1.2× 1.1k 1.9× 619 1.5× 510 4.4× 109 1.0× 87 1.7k
Guilhem Collier United Kingdom 21 459 0.7× 835 1.4× 376 0.9× 418 3.6× 71 0.7× 75 1.1k
Marcel Gutberlet Germany 27 1.3k 2.0× 774 1.3× 547 1.3× 221 1.9× 126 1.2× 115 1.9k
Sarah Svenningsen Canada 26 587 0.9× 1.2k 2.0× 1.1k 2.5× 472 4.1× 90 0.8× 78 2.1k
S Tuengerthal Germany 14 331 0.5× 258 0.4× 388 0.9× 41 0.4× 58 0.5× 40 726
Roya Etemad‐Rezai Canada 17 569 0.9× 889 1.5× 523 1.3× 429 3.7× 45 0.4× 28 1.2k
Neil Woodhouse United Kingdom 27 831 1.3× 1.1k 1.8× 461 1.1× 654 5.6× 38 0.4× 49 1.9k
H.‐U. Kauczor Germany 13 444 0.7× 547 0.9× 201 0.5× 365 3.1× 52 0.5× 30 820

Countries citing papers authored by C. Hintze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Hintze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Hintze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Hintze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Hintze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Hintze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Hintze. The network helps show where C. Hintze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Hintze

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Hintze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Hintze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Hintze. C. Hintze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gömöry, F, J Šouc, Mykola Solovyov, et al.. (2024). Hysteresis and Coupling Loss in Filamentized REBCO Tapes. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 35(5). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bauman, Grzegorz, et al.. (2015). Pulmonary perfusion imaging: Qualitative comparison of TCIR MRI and SPECT/CT in porcine lung. European Journal of Radiology. 84(12). 2646–2653. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dinkel, Julien, Omid Khalilzadeh, C. Hintze, et al.. (2013). Inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automatic tumor diameter measurement and volumetric analysis in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 82(1). 76–82. 38 indexed citations
5.
Biederer, Jürgen, Saeed Mirsadraee, Meinrad Beer, et al.. (2012). MRI of the lung (3/3)—current applications and future perspectives. Insights into Imaging. 3(4). 373–386. 125 indexed citations
6.
Dinkel, Julien, Grzegorz Bauman, Moritz Zaiß, et al.. (2012). Non‐contrast‐enhanced MRI of the pulmonary blood volume using two‐compartment‐modeled T1‐relaxation. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 36(2). 397–404. 11 indexed citations
7.
Breuer, Felix, Philipp Ehses, Michael Völker, et al.. (2012). DC‐gated high resolution three‐dimensional lung imaging during free‐breathing. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 37(3). 727–732. 26 indexed citations
8.
Bauman, Grzegorz, Ulf Lützen, Julien Dinkel, et al.. (2011). Pulmonary Functional Imaging: Qualitative Comparison of Fourier Decomposition MR Imaging with SPECT/CT in Porcine Lung. Radiology. 260(2). 551–559. 85 indexed citations
9.
Qureshi, Nagmi R., C. Hintze, F. Risse, et al.. (2011). The Feasibility of Low Mechanical Index Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Distinguishing Malignant from Benign Thoracic Lesions. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 37(11). 1747–1754. 11 indexed citations
10.
Hintze, C., Julien Dinkel, J. Biederer, Claus Peter Heußel, & Michael Puderbach. (2011). Staging des Lungenkarzinoms. Der Radiologe. 51(2). 135–144. 1 indexed citations
11.
Gerigk, Lars, et al.. (2010). Software-guided standardization of manual landmark data in medical images. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 21(1). 42–51. 4 indexed citations
12.
Hintze, C., Julien Dinkel, J. Biederer, Claus Peter Heußel, & Michael Puderbach. (2010). Neue Verfahren: Umfassendes Staging des Lungenkarzinoms mit der MRT. Der Radiologe. 50(8). 699–705. 2 indexed citations
13.
Hintze, C., Julien Dinkel, J. Biederer, Claus Peter Heußel, & Michael Puderbach. (2010). Neue Verfahren. Der Radiologe. 50(8). 699–705. 7 indexed citations
14.
Hintze, C., Alto Stemmer, Michael Bock, et al.. (2009). A Hybrid Breath Hold and Continued Respiration-Triggered Technique for Time-Resolved 3D MRI Perfusion Studies in Lung Cancer. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 182(1). 45–52. 10 indexed citations
15.
Dinkel, Julien, C. Hintze, Nathalie Rochet, Christian Thieke, & J. Biederer. (2009). Computertomographie der Lunge. Der Radiologe. 49(8). 698–704. 2 indexed citations
16.
Biederer, J., C. Hintze, M. Fabel, & Julien Dinkel. (2009). Untersuchung der atemabhängigen Bewegungen pulmonaler Raumforderungen mit der MRT. Der Radiologe. 49(8). 705–711. 2 indexed citations
17.
Bauman, Grzegorz, Michael Puderbach, M. Deimling, et al.. (2009). Non‐contrast‐enhanced perfusion and ventilation assessment of the human lung by means of fourier decomposition in proton MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 62(3). 656–664. 241 indexed citations
18.
Hintze, C., J. Biederer, Heinrich Wenz, Ralf Eberhardt, & Hans‐Ulrich Kauczor. (2006). MRT zum Staging des Lungenkarzinoms. Der Radiologe. 46(4). 251–259. 12 indexed citations
19.
20.
Rieker, O., Peter Mildenberger, C. Hintze, et al.. (2000). Segmentanatomie der Leber in der Computertomographie: Lokalisieren wir die Läsionen richtig?*. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 172(2). 147–152. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026