C. Faure

503 total citations
9 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

C. Faure is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Faure has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cancer Research, 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in C. Faure's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). C. Faure is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). C. Faure collaborates with scholars based in France and United States. C. Faure's co-authors include Gilles Houvenaeghel, Jean‐Marc Classe, Roman Rouzier, Pierre Gimbergues, C. Tunon de Lara, Pierre‐François Dupré, Charlotte Ngô, L. Campion, Jean-Luc Verhaeghe and Gwénaël Ferron and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

In The Last Decade

C. Faure

9 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Faure France	6	209	152	103	83	20	9	245
Jacques R. Vilcoq France	4	323 1.5×	260 1.7×	143 1.4×	103 1.2×	25 1.3×	6	360
José Roberto Morales Piato Brazil	10	249 1.2×	160 1.1×	198 1.9×	66 0.8×	18 0.9×	23	313
Roswitha Köberle-Wührer Austria	5	251 1.2×	172 1.1×	204 2.0×	115 1.4×	13 0.7×	10	314
Ákos Sávolt Hungary	6	316 1.5×	222 1.5×	209 2.0×	130 1.6×	28 1.4×	29	353
Takao Taniya Japan	12	199 1.0×	157 1.0×	203 2.0×	103 1.2×	28 1.4×	29	332
Solomon Henry United States	5	194 0.9×	158 1.0×	90 0.9×	110 1.3×	31 1.6×	18	269
Amina Khan Pakistan	9	137 0.7×	101 0.7×	71 0.7×	62 0.7×	21 1.1×	41	225
Emilia Marrazzo Italy	8	135 0.6×	85 0.6×	92 0.9×	85 1.0×	33 1.6×	21	230
Tammeza Gibson United States	7	217 1.0×	148 1.0×	159 1.5×	166 2.0×	12 0.6×	8	317
Helen Mabry United States	4	135 0.6×	110 0.7×	51 0.5×	59 0.7×	12 0.6×	7	165

Countries citing papers authored by C. Faure

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Faure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Faure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Faure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Faure

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Faure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Faure. The network helps show where C. Faure may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Faure

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Faure. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Faure based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Faure. C. Faure is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Classe, Jean‐Marc, Pierre Gimbergues, S. Alran, et al.. (2018). Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 173(2). 343–352. 162 indexed citations

2.

Houvenaeghel, Gilles, Jean Marc Classe, Jean-Rémy Garbay, et al.. (2016). Survival impact and predictive factors of axillary recurrence after sentinel biopsy. European Journal of Cancer. 58. 73–82. 21 indexed citations

3.

Houvenaeghel, Gilles, Renaud Sabatier, Fabien Reyal, et al.. (2016). Axillary lymph node micrometastases decrease triple-negative early breast cancer survival. British Journal of Cancer. 115(9). 1024–1031. 25 indexed citations

4.

Campion, L., F. Dravet, Philippe Descamps, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous breast surgery for breast cancer: GATA study. The Breast. 28. 54–59. 20 indexed citations

5.

Schmitt, Caroline, Isabelle Treilleux, Olivier Trédan, et al.. (2015). Envahissement ganglionnaire axillaire sans tumeur primitive mammaire retrouvée : à propos de 16cas issus d’une cohorte de 7770patientes. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 43(9). 588–592. 2 indexed citations

6.

Faure, C., et al.. (2010). Découverte périménopausique d’un endométriome sur abcès ovarien. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 39(1). e20–e22. 2 indexed citations

7.

Leroy, J., I. Patry, C. Faure, et al.. (2009). Audit régional de l’usage des fluoroquinolones à l’hôpital et en ville : y a-t-il une surconsommation de ces antibiotiques ?. Pathologie Biologie. 59(5). e103–e107. 6 indexed citations

8.

Grüner, M, et al.. (1981). Nephroblastoma and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.. PubMed. 24(1). 39–42. 5 indexed citations

9.

Faure, C. & Julia Lange. (1967). Néphroblastome et aniridie.. 10(7). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact