This map shows the geographic impact of C. F. Claver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. F. Claver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. F. Claver more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. F. Claver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. F. Claver. The network helps show where C. F. Claver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. F. Claver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. F. Claver.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. F. Claver based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. F. Claver. C. F. Claver is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Xin, B., A. Roodman, George Z. Angeli, C. F. Claver, & Sandrine Thomas. (2016). Comparison of LSST and DECam wavefront recovery algorithms. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9906. 99064J–99064J.6 indexed citations
Coughlin, M. W., C. F. Claver, C. W. Stubbs, & J. Tonry. (2014). Optical All-Sky Camera for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. 224.1 indexed citations
7.
Tyson, J. A., José Sasián, K. Gilmore, et al.. (2014). LSST optical beam simulator. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9154. 915415–915415.5 indexed citations
Sebag, Jacques, et al.. (2014). LSST telescope integration and tests. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9145. 91454A–91454A.2 indexed citations
10.
Neill, Douglas R., et al.. (2014). Overview of the LSST active optics system. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9150. 91500G–91500G.26 indexed citations
Gressler, William J., Jacques Sebag, & C. F. Claver. (2012). Initial alignment and commissioning plan for the LSST. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8444. 844444–844444.1 indexed citations
13.
Burke, D. L., T. S. Axelrod, Aurélien Barrau, et al.. (2011). Calibration of LSST Instrumental and Atmospheric Photometric Passbands. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
14.
Claver, C. F., Lynn G. Seppala, Liang Meng, et al.. (2007). Performance and Analysis of the LSST Optical System. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 211.1 indexed citations
15.
Burke, David, T. S. Axelrod, C. F. Claver, et al.. (2006). Calibrations of LSST camera and telescope systems. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6267. 626715–626715.1 indexed citations
16.
Sebag, Jacques, et al.. (2006). LSST site evaluation. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6267. 62671R–62671R.3 indexed citations
Krisciunas, K., C. Aspin⋆, T. R. Geballe, et al.. (1993). The 9 Aurigae system. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 263(3). 781–788.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.