C. E. Schlemm

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 634 citations indexed

About

C. E. Schlemm is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. E. Schlemm has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 634 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Radiation and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in C. E. Schlemm's work include Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (6 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers). C. E. Schlemm is often cited by papers focused on Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (6 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers). C. E. Schlemm collaborates with scholars based in United States. C. E. Schlemm's co-authors include R. Starr, L. R. Nittler, S. Z. Weider, Sean C. Solomon, T. J. McCoy, J. Goldsten, Ann L. Sprague, D. J. Lawrence, C. M. Ernst and R. L. McNutt and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Space Science Reviews.

In The Last Decade

C. E. Schlemm

9 papers receiving 620 citations

Hit Papers

The Major-Element Composition of Mercury’s Surface from M... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. E. Schlemm United States 5 580 145 140 123 31 10 634
S. Massetti Italy 18 870 1.5× 54 0.4× 122 0.9× 121 1.0× 16 0.5× 57 904
W. Miyake Japan 16 788 1.4× 97 0.7× 87 0.6× 171 1.4× 23 0.7× 67 846
Hong Zou China 15 657 1.1× 112 0.8× 58 0.4× 149 1.2× 13 0.4× 77 728
J. Mukherjee United States 12 694 1.2× 44 0.3× 85 0.6× 107 0.9× 11 0.4× 31 717
E. Kirsch Germany 13 591 1.0× 68 0.5× 34 0.2× 113 0.9× 13 0.4× 57 607
X. Vallières France 16 728 1.3× 131 0.9× 41 0.3× 155 1.3× 28 0.9× 42 741
S. Jurač United States 15 700 1.2× 57 0.4× 103 0.7× 169 1.4× 10 0.3× 22 764
C. J. Snead United States 14 503 0.9× 77 0.5× 69 0.5× 14 0.1× 29 0.9× 44 602
Yu. N. Krugly Ukraine 17 841 1.4× 135 0.9× 108 0.8× 25 0.2× 16 0.5× 72 858
R. E. Johnson United States 13 495 0.9× 24 0.2× 101 0.7× 92 0.7× 15 0.5× 38 573

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Schlemm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Schlemm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Schlemm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Schlemm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Schlemm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Schlemm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Schlemm. The network helps show where C. E. Schlemm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. E. Schlemm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. E. Schlemm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. E. Schlemm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. E. Schlemm. C. E. Schlemm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Starr, R., C. E. Schlemm, G. C. Ho, et al.. (2016). Calibration of the MESSENGER X-Ray Spectrometer. Planetary and Space Science. 122. 13–25. 4 indexed citations
2.
Mitchell, D. G., S. M. Krimigis, A. F. Cheng, et al.. (2013). The Imaging Neutral Camera for the Cassini Mission to Saturn and Titan. Geophysical monograph. 103. 281–287.
3.
Mauk, B. H., D. K. Haggerty, S. Jaskulek, et al.. (2013). The Jupiter Energetic Particle Detector Instrument (JEDI) Investigation for the Juno Mission. Space Science Reviews. 213(1-4). 289–346. 156 indexed citations
4.
Starr, R., D. Schriver, L. R. Nittler, et al.. (2012). MESSENGER detection of electron‐induced X‐ray fluorescence from Mercury's surface. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 117(E12). 38 indexed citations
5.
Nittler, L. R., R. Starr, S. Z. Weider, et al.. (2011). The Major-Element Composition of Mercury’s Surface from MESSENGER X-ray Spectrometry. Science. 333(6051). 1847–1850. 328 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Mœbius, E., H. Kucharek, M. Granoff, et al.. (2006). Time-of-Flight Detector System with Low Background Performance for the IBEX-lo Sensor. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern). 1 indexed citations
7.
Schlemm, C. E., et al.. (2005). Advanced electronics developed for NASA's Mars Exploration Program. 942–951. 1 indexed citations
8.
Starr, R., G. C. Ho, C. E. Schlemm, et al.. (2001). The X-Ray Spectrometer for Mercury MESSENGER. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 102. 2 indexed citations
9.
Mitchell, D. G., S. Jaskulek, C. E. Schlemm, et al.. (2000). High energy neutral atom (hena) imager for the IMAGE mission. Space Science Reviews. 91(1-2). 67–112. 97 indexed citations
10.
Mitchell, D. G., S. M. Krimigis, A. F. Cheng, et al.. (1996). <title>Imaging-neutral camera (INCA) for the NASA Cassini mission to Saturn and Titan</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2803. 154–161. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026