C. E. Parnell

3.7k total citations
82 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

C. E. Parnell is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. E. Parnell has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 77 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 30 papers in Molecular Biology and 12 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in C. E. Parnell's work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (76 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (49 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (30 papers). C. E. Parnell is often cited by papers focused on Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (76 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (49 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (30 papers). C. E. Parnell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. C. E. Parnell's co-authors include E. R. Priest, A. L. Haynes, P. E. Jupp, K. Galsgaard, I. De Moortel, T. Neukirch, Markus J. Aschwanden, S. F. Martin, J. M. Smith and L. Golub and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

C. E. Parnell

78 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. E. Parnell United Kingdom 29 2.3k 670 220 159 42 82 2.4k
D. W. Longcope United States 29 2.4k 1.0× 828 1.2× 177 0.8× 140 0.9× 18 0.4× 86 2.5k
Daniele Telloni Italy 21 1.6k 0.7× 531 0.8× 82 0.4× 222 1.4× 44 1.0× 114 1.7k
S. Dasso Argentina 32 2.9k 1.3× 1.1k 1.6× 113 0.5× 178 1.1× 97 2.3× 115 3.0k
J. McTiernan United States 20 1.5k 0.7× 339 0.5× 139 0.6× 152 1.0× 124 3.0× 43 1.6k
F. Pantellini United States 19 1.6k 0.7× 395 0.6× 199 0.9× 73 0.5× 86 2.0× 168 1.6k
T. N. Parashar United States 27 1.7k 0.7× 510 0.8× 392 1.8× 65 0.4× 59 1.4× 78 1.8k
Nicole Vilmer France 25 2.0k 0.9× 319 0.5× 247 1.1× 147 0.9× 129 3.1× 99 2.0k
L. Fletcher United Kingdom 30 3.8k 1.7× 893 1.3× 206 0.9× 395 2.5× 74 1.8× 138 3.9k
É. Pariat France 34 3.3k 1.4× 926 1.4× 107 0.5× 217 1.4× 24 0.6× 73 3.3k
Robert J. Leamon United States 22 2.5k 1.1× 981 1.5× 178 0.8× 157 1.0× 33 0.8× 56 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Parnell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Parnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Parnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Parnell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Parnell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Parnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Parnell. The network helps show where C. E. Parnell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. E. Parnell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. E. Parnell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. E. Parnell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. E. Parnell. C. E. Parnell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Neukirch, T., et al.. (2020). Particle acceleration with anomalous pitch angle scattering in 3D separator reconnection. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 6 indexed citations
2.
Olshevsky, Vyacheslav, D. I. Pontin, C. E. Parnell, et al.. (2020). A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations
3.
Reid, J., P. J. Cargill, A. W. Hood, C. E. Parnell, & T. D. Arber. (2019). Coronal energy release by MHD avalanches: Heating mechanisms. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 633. A158–A158. 18 indexed citations
4.
Reid, J., C. E. Parnell, A. W. Hood, & P. K. Browning. (2019). Determining whether the squashing factor, Q, would be a good indicator of reconnection in a resistive MHD experiment devoid of null points. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 633. A92–A92. 9 indexed citations
5.
Bourdin, Philippe-A., et al.. (2016). Particle dynamics in a non-flaring solar active region model. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations
6.
Meyer, Karen, D. H. Mackay, A. A. van Ballegooijen, & C. E. Parnell. (2011). Solar Magnetic Carpet I: Simulation of Synthetic Magnetograms. Solar Physics. 272(1). 29–58. 9 indexed citations
7.
Cargill, P. J., C. E. Parnell, P. K. Browning, I. De Moortel, & A. W. Hood. (2010). Magnetic reconnection in the solar atmosphere: from proposal to paradigm. Astronomy & Geophysics. 51(3). 3.31–3.35. 6 indexed citations
8.
Régnier, Stéphane, C. E. Parnell, & A. L. Haynes. (2008). A new view of quiet-Sun topology from Hinode/SOT. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 33 indexed citations
9.
DeForest, C. E., D. A. Lamb, Tom Berger, et al.. (2008). The Small-Scale Field Measured With Hinode/SOT and Feature Tracking: Where is the mixed- polarity flux?. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2008.
10.
Lamb, D. A., C. E. DeForest, H. J. Hagenaar, C. E. Parnell, & B. T. Welsch. (2008). Solar Magnetic Tracking. II. The Apparent Unipolar Origin of Quiet‐Sun Flux. The Astrophysical Journal. 674(1). 520–529. 40 indexed citations
11.
Parnell, C. E.. (2007). 3D magnetic reconnection, flares and coronal heating. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana. 78. 229. 1 indexed citations
12.
Lamb, D. A., C. E. DeForest, H. J. Hagenaar, C. E. Parnell, & B. T. Welsch. (2007). Feature Tracking of Hinode Magnetograms. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.
13.
Rekowski, B. von, C. E. Parnell, & E. R. Priest. (2006). Solar coronal heating by magnetic cancellation -- I. Connected equal bipoles. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 366(1). 125–136. 20 indexed citations
14.
Parnell, C. E., et al.. (2005). Domain structures in complex 3D magnetic fields. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics. 99(6). 513–534. 10 indexed citations
15.
Parnell, C. E., et al.. (2005). Coronal Flux Recycling Times. Solar Physics. 231(1-2). 45–70. 23 indexed citations
16.
Bewsher, D., D. E. Innes, & C. E. Parnell. (2003). Comparison of Blinkers and Explosive Events. 34. 1 indexed citations
17.
Brown, D. S., C. E. Parnell, E. E. DeLuca, et al.. (2002). Magnetic structure and reconnection of x-ray bright points in the solar corona. Advances in Space Research. 29(7). 1093–1099. 3 indexed citations
18.
Brown, D. S., C. E. Parnell, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, & R. A. McMullen. (2001). The Magnetic Structure of a Coronal X-Ray Bright Point. Solar Physics. 201(2). 305–321. 46 indexed citations
19.
Parnell, C. E., E. R. Priest, & L. Golub. (1994). The three-dimensional structures of X-ray bright points. Solar Physics. 151(1). 57–74. 70 indexed citations
20.
Priest, E. R., C. E. Parnell, & S. F. Martin. (1994). A converging flux model of an X-ray bright point and an associated canceling magnetic feature. The Astrophysical Journal. 427. 459–459. 164 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026