Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of C E Lundgren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C E Lundgren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C E Lundgren more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C E Lundgren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C E Lundgren. The network helps show where C E Lundgren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C E Lundgren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C E Lundgren.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C E Lundgren based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C E Lundgren. C E Lundgren is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ray, Andrew D., et al.. (2012). Energy cost of breathing at depth: effect of respiratory muscle training.. PubMed. 39(4). 829–36.6 indexed citations
Lundgren, C E, et al.. (2004). The theory and application of intravascular microbubbles as an ultra-effective means of transporting oxygen and other gases.. PubMed. 31(1). 105–6.7 indexed citations
4.
Olszowka, Albert J., Barbara E. Shykoff, D. R. Pendergast, C E Lundgren, & Leon E. Farhi. (2003). Cardiac output: a view from Buffalo. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 90(3-4). 292–304.4 indexed citations
5.
Logue, Gerald L., et al.. (1997). Diving decompression fails to activate complement.. PubMed. 24(2). 51–7.7 indexed citations
Norfleet, William T., et al.. (1992). Physiologically and subjectively acceptable breathing resistance in divers' breathing gear.. PubMed. 19(6). 427–45.20 indexed citations
8.
Ferrigno, Massimo, Bruno Grassi, Guido Ferretti, et al.. (1991). Electrocardiogram during deep breath-hold dives by elite divers.. PubMed. 18(2). 81–91.34 indexed citations
9.
Olszowka, Albert J., et al.. (1991). O2 pressures between 0.12 and 2.5 atm abs, circulatory function, and N2 elimination.. PubMed. 18(4). 279–92.17 indexed citations
10.
Norfleet, William T., et al.. (1990). CO2 retention with minimal symptoms but severe dysfunction during wet simulated dives to 6.8 atm abs.. PubMed. 17(6). 515–23.16 indexed citations
11.
Norfleet, William T., et al.. (1987). Respiratory function in the upright, working diver at 6.8 ATA (190 fsw).. PubMed. 14(3). 241–62.7 indexed citations
Lundgren, C E, et al.. (1983). Influence of exercise on maximal voluntary ventilation and forced expiratory flow at depth.. PubMed. 10(3). 241–54.
14.
Lundgren, C E, et al.. (1976). Heart rate and respiratory frequency in hydrostatically compressed, liquid-breathing mice.. PubMed. 3(4). 303–20.5 indexed citations
15.
Lundgren, C E, et al.. (1975). Nausea and abdominal discomfort--possible relation to aerophagia during diving: an epidemiologic study.. PubMed. 2(3). 155–60.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.