C E Finch

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

C E Finch is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, C E Finch has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in C E Finch's work include Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper). C E Finch is often cited by papers focused on Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper). C E Finch collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. C E Finch's co-authors include RM Sapolsky, Hideo Uno, Rebert Cs, Heinz H. Osterburg, Carl W. Anderson, Giulio Maria Pasinetti, Steve A. Johnson, Oda T, Franz Hefti and T.H. McNeill and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Trends in Neurosciences.

In The Last Decade

C E Finch

9 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Hippocampal damage associated with prolonged glucocortico... 1990 2026 2002 2014 1990 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C E Finch United States 7 414 299 213 209 195 9 1.1k
Olaf Schulte‐Herbrüggen Germany 23 317 0.8× 660 2.2× 282 1.3× 178 0.9× 149 0.8× 38 1.5k
Elin Åberg Sweden 14 223 0.5× 239 0.8× 139 0.7× 169 0.8× 149 0.8× 17 833
Luciana Romina Frick United States 25 235 0.6× 379 1.3× 149 0.7× 379 1.8× 285 1.5× 38 1.5k
Amy Mahan United States 10 515 1.2× 491 1.6× 128 0.6× 457 2.2× 238 1.2× 13 1.6k
Kristen C. Klemenhagen United States 8 317 0.8× 390 1.3× 272 1.3× 380 1.8× 168 0.9× 14 1.8k
John D. H. Stead Canada 19 249 0.6× 274 0.9× 135 0.6× 455 2.2× 122 0.6× 25 1.3k
Shosh Gil Israel 20 506 1.2× 205 0.7× 193 0.9× 532 2.5× 64 0.3× 27 1.4k
Daniel R. Rosell United States 18 212 0.5× 661 2.2× 411 1.9× 263 1.3× 290 1.5× 30 1.5k
Alessia Luoni Italy 22 565 1.4× 370 1.2× 219 1.0× 336 1.6× 75 0.4× 31 1.4k
Guiqing Cai United States 22 362 0.9× 214 0.7× 100 0.5× 717 3.4× 264 1.4× 37 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by C E Finch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C E Finch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C E Finch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C E Finch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C E Finch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C E Finch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C E Finch. The network helps show where C E Finch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C E Finch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C E Finch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C E Finch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C E Finch. C E Finch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Iwata, Nobuhisa, Ning Zhao, Wendy R. Kam, et al.. (2015). Glutamatergic neurons in rodent models respond to nanoscale particulate urban air pollutants in vivo and in vitro. 2. 2 indexed citations
2.
Kirkwood, Tbl, et al.. (1999). The evolution of non-infectious and degenerative disease. 4 indexed citations
3.
Finch, C E & Myron F. Goodman. (1997). Discussion. Trends in Neurosciences. 20(11). 501–507. 28 indexed citations
4.
Vellis, Jean de, et al.. (1996). Hippocampal Responses to Corticosterone and Stress, One of which is the 35,000 Mr Protein, Glycerol Phosphate Dehydrogenase. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 8(11). 867–876. 11 indexed citations
5.
T, Oda, Giulio Maria Pasinetti, Heinz H. Osterburg, et al.. (1994). Purification and Characterization of Brain Clusterin. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 204(3). 1131–1136. 94 indexed citations
6.
Lamballe, Fabienne, Rüdiger Klein, Mariano Barbacid, et al.. (1993). Induction of noncatalytic TrkB neurotrophin receptors during axonal sprouting in the adult hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience. 13(9). 4001–4014. 123 indexed citations
7.
Poirier, Judes, Patrick C. May, Heinz H. Osterburg, et al.. (1990). Selective alterations of RNA in rat hippocampus after entorhinal cortex lesioning.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 87(1). 303–307. 47 indexed citations
8.
Sapolsky, RM, Hideo Uno, Rebert Cs, & C E Finch. (1990). Hippocampal damage associated with prolonged glucocorticoid exposure in primates. Journal of Neuroscience. 10(9). 2897–2902. 829 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Severson, James A., R N Pittman, J. Gál, Perry B. Molinoff, & C E Finch. (1986). Genetic influence on the regulation of beta adrenergic receptors in mice.. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 236(1). 24–29. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026