C. d’Ercole

512 total citations
27 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

C. d’Ercole is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, C. d’Ercole has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 10 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in C. d’Ercole's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). C. d’Ercole is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). C. d’Ercole collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Italy. C. d’Ercole's co-authors include L. Cravello, Léon Boubli, Florence Bretelle, M. Gamerre, Blandine Courbière, Aubert Agostini, Chafika Mazouni, L. Boubli, R. Shojai and Valérie Roger and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Journal of Perinatal Medicine and Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

In The Last Decade

C. d’Ercole

24 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. d’Ercole France 8 224 195 131 45 26 27 301
Adekunle A. Sobande Saudi Arabia 10 169 0.8× 185 0.9× 161 1.2× 32 0.7× 15 0.6× 36 334
Krishna Dahiya India 10 143 0.6× 92 0.5× 119 0.9× 84 1.9× 58 2.2× 55 303
Cem Turan Türkiye 12 226 1.0× 108 0.6× 108 0.8× 74 1.6× 27 1.0× 27 431
Neşe Yücel Türkiye 10 243 1.1× 229 1.2× 144 1.1× 49 1.1× 39 1.5× 20 365
Samuel Bender United States 8 109 0.5× 165 0.8× 104 0.8× 23 0.5× 11 0.4× 16 262
Samina Dornan Ireland 6 372 1.7× 405 2.1× 227 1.7× 25 0.6× 13 0.5× 17 457
Masako Hayashi Japan 10 194 0.9× 292 1.5× 137 1.0× 32 0.7× 32 1.2× 17 391
P Reif Austria 10 141 0.6× 114 0.6× 77 0.6× 62 1.4× 25 1.0× 30 263
Vinay Prasad United States 7 205 0.9× 219 1.1× 100 0.8× 32 0.7× 8 0.3× 14 318
A. Tigaizin France 9 96 0.4× 101 0.5× 34 0.3× 25 0.6× 60 2.3× 19 195

Countries citing papers authored by C. d’Ercole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. d’Ercole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. d’Ercole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. d’Ercole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. d’Ercole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. d’Ercole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. d’Ercole. The network helps show where C. d’Ercole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. d’Ercole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. d’Ercole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. d’Ercole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. d’Ercole. C. d’Ercole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ancel, Pierre‐Yves, Gérard Bréart, H. Bruel, et al.. (2020). Propositions sur la prise en charge en cas d’extrême prématurité – Le groupe de travail « Extrême Prématurité » pour la SFMP, le CNGOF et la SFN. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie . 48(12). 850–857. 7 indexed citations
2.
3.
Tosello, Barthélémy, Julie Blanc, Jean‐Baptiste Haumonté, C. d’Ercole, & Catherine Gire. (2013). Short and medium-term outcomes of live-born twins after fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndromea. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 42(1). 99–105. 12 indexed citations
4.
Shojai, R., Florence Bretelle, C. d’Ercole, L. Boubli, & Marie‐Dominique Piercecchi. (2012). Analyse de la sinistralité en gynécologie-obstétrique : expérience d’un CHU en France. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 42(1). 71–75. 7 indexed citations
5.
Provansal, Magali, Blandine Courbière, Aubert Agostini, et al.. (2011). Fertility and Obstetric Outcome After Conservative Management of Placenta Accreta. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 31(2). 116–117. 1 indexed citations
6.
d’Ercole, C.. (2009). Allo-immunisation fœtomaternelle érythrocytaire. 32(3). 1–7. 1 indexed citations
7.
Carcopino, Xavier, R. Shojai, C. d’Ercole, & Léon Boubli. (2006). French trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology theoretical training and practice of vaginal breech delivery: A national survey. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 135(1). 17–20. 7 indexed citations
8.
Bretelle, Florence, Blandine Courbière, Chafika Mazouni, et al.. (2006). Management of placenta accreta: Morbidity and outcome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 133(1). 34–39. 138 indexed citations
9.
Shojai, R., Kathia Chaumoître, Cécile Chau, et al.. (2006). Advanced Combined Abdominal and Intrauterine Pregnancy: A Case Report. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 22(2). 128–130. 7 indexed citations
10.
d’Ercole, C., et al.. (2005). Extraction instrumentale par spatules de Thierry. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 34(8). 795–801. 27 indexed citations
11.
Chau, Cécile, et al.. (2004). Congenital Laryngeal Cyst: Benefits of Prenatal Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Perinatal Management. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 19(4). 373–376. 10 indexed citations
12.
Quarello, E., Raoul Desbrière, Olivier Hartung, et al.. (2004). Thrombophlébite de la veine ovarienne du post-partum. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 33(5). 430–440. 12 indexed citations
13.
Goffinet, François, et al.. (2003). Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Menace d’accouchement prématuré à membranes intactes. Conclusions (2002). Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 31(2). 178–183. 8 indexed citations
14.
Gire, Catherine, C. Nicaise, R. Shojai, et al.. (2002). Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane and Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome before 20 Weeks: A Favourable Outcome. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 17(4). 252–254. 1 indexed citations
15.
Porcu, Géraldine, L. Cravello, C. d’Ercole, et al.. (2000). Hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus and repetitive abortions: reproductive outcome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 88(1). 81–84. 40 indexed citations
16.
Nicaise, C., et al.. (2000). Hyperthyroïdie néonatale chez un prématuré né de mère atteinte d'une maladie de Basedow. Archives de Pédiatrie. 7(5). 505–508. 3 indexed citations
17.
Cravello, L., et al.. (1999). [Impact of adenomyosis on results of endometrial ablations].. PubMed. 27(5). 357–63. 6 indexed citations
18.
Bretelle, Florence, et al.. (1998). [Birth after two cesarean sections: the role of trial of labor].. PubMed. 27(4). 421–4. 1 indexed citations
19.
Boubli, L., et al.. (1997). [Hysteroscopy infection risk].. PubMed. 26(3). 250–5. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bautrant, Éric, et al.. (1993). [Delivery after 2 previous cesarean sections. A series of 41 uterine trials].. PubMed. 22(5). 543–7. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026