Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Investigating landslides with space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry
2006642 citationsC. Colesanti, Janusz WąsowskiEngineering Geologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Colesanti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Colesanti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Colesanti more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Colesanti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Colesanti. The network helps show where C. Colesanti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Colesanti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Colesanti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Colesanti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Colesanti. C. Colesanti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Colesanti, C., Francesco De Zan, A. Ferretti, C. Prati, & F. Rocca. (2004). Generation of DEM with sub-metric vertical accuracy from 30' ERS-ENVISAT pairs. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha). 550. 1–6.9 indexed citations
Arrigoni, Michel, C. Colesanti, A. Ferretti, Daniele Perissin, & F. Rocca. (2004). Identification of the Location Phase Screen of ERS-ENVISAT Permanent Scatterers. 550. 28.14 indexed citations
9.
Fruneau, Bénédicte, Benoı̂t Deffontaines, J.P. Rudant, et al.. (2004). Conventional and PS Differential SAR Interferometry for Monitoring Vertical Deformation due to Water Pumping: The Haussmann-St-Lazare Case Example (Paris, France). 550. 23.5 indexed citations
10.
Ferretti, A., C. Colesanti, Daniele Perissin, et al.. (2004). EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF THE OBSERVATION TIME ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SAR PERMANENT SCATTERERS. 550. 26.43 indexed citations
Colesanti, C., A. Ferretti, C. Prati, & F. Rocca. (2003). An Overview of SAR Permanent Scatterers: A New Tool for High Precision Ground Deformation Monitoring", Invited Presentation, EGS -- AGU -- EUG Joint Assembly, Nice (France), 6-11 April 2003. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha). 1–4.2 indexed citations
15.
Allievi, J., et al.. (2002). Integration of Field and Remote Sensing Techniques For Landslides Monitoring. EGS General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 5790.1 indexed citations
16.
Colesanti, C., A. Ferretti, Claudio Prati, & F. Rocca. (2002). Seismic faults analysis in California by means of the permanent scatterers technique. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha). 475. 125–131.1 indexed citations
Colesanti, C., D. Leva, G. Nesti, et al.. (2000). A ground-based parasitic SAR experiment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 38(5). 2132–2141.77 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.