C. Aa. Diget

1.9k total citations
37 papers, 427 citations indexed

About

C. Aa. Diget is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Aa. Diget has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 427 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 16 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in C. Aa. Diget's work include Nuclear physics research studies (33 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (14 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (12 papers). C. Aa. Diget is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (33 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (14 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (12 papers). C. Aa. Diget collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. C. Aa. Diget's co-authors include H. O. U. Fynbo, O. Tengblad, T. Nilsson, D. Bazin, A. Gade, D. Weißhaar, K. Riisager, T. Glasmacher, L. M. Fraile and B. Jonson and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

C. Aa. Diget

33 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Aa. Diget United Kingdom	13	395	194	114	43	41	37	427
J. Shergur United States	13	370 0.9×	173 0.9×	124 1.1×	24 0.6×	30 0.7×	27	401
J. M. Casandjian France	10	357 0.9×	132 0.7×	103 0.9×	42 1.0×	26 0.6×	27	383
Y. Shimbara Japan	13	497 1.3×	307 1.6×	133 1.2×	76 1.8×	28 0.7×	46	532
D. Sohler Hungary	9	316 0.8×	166 0.9×	61 0.5×	55 1.3×	18 0.4×	29	334
R. Shane United States	13	386 1.0×	222 1.1×	107 0.9×	52 1.2×	14 0.3×	26	418
M. Alcorta United States	11	345 0.9×	167 0.9×	101 0.9×	29 0.7×	19 0.5×	43	365
D. N. Kadrev Bulgaria	14	463 1.2×	210 1.1×	46 0.4×	45 1.0×	28 0.7×	37	471
N. Hoteling United States	14	377 1.0×	184 0.9×	121 1.1×	23 0.5×	37 0.9×	37	424
S. N. Liddick United States	13	555 1.4×	238 1.2×	232 2.0×	61 1.4×	18 0.4×	38	588
D. Gupta India	12	331 0.8×	142 0.7×	115 1.0×	54 1.3×	11 0.3×	32	376

Countries citing papers authored by C. Aa. Diget

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Aa. Diget's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Aa. Diget with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Aa. Diget more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Aa. Diget

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Aa. Diget. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Aa. Diget. The network helps show where C. Aa. Diget may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Aa. Diget

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Aa. Diget. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Aa. Diget based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Aa. Diget. C. Aa. Diget is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Laird, A. M., P. Adsley, R. Longland, et al.. (2024). Ne21 energy levels approaching the α-particle threshold. Physical review. C. 109(4).

Post, Mark, et al.. (2023). Low-cost and miniaturized temperature compensation system for nuclear applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1055. 168410–168410.

Adsley, P., A. M. Laird, R. Longland, et al.. (2022). The impact of 17O + α reaction rate uncertainties on the s-process in rotating massive stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 514(2). 2650–2657. 6 indexed citations

Pastore, Alessandro, et al.. (2021). From nuclei to neutron stars: simple binding energy computer modelling in the classroom (part 1). Physics Education. 56(3). 35012–35012.

Fryer, Chris L., Samuel Jones, Benoît Côté, et al.. (2019). Nucleosynthetic yields from neutron stars accreting in binary common envelopes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 485(1). 620–639. 3 indexed citations

Spieker, M., D. Weißhaar, A. Gade, et al.. (2019). Experimental identification of the T=1, Jπ=6+ state of Co54 and isospin symmetry in A=54 studied via one-nucleon knockout reactions. Physical review. C. 100(6). 1 indexed citations

Barton, C. J., C. Aa. Diget, S. Courtin, et al.. (2018). Rotational excitation of the Hoyle state in ¹²C. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 940. 12043–12043. 1 indexed citations

Neveling, R., P. Adsley, P. Papka, et al.. (2017). Characterization of the proposed 4−α cluster state candidate in O16. Physical review. C. 95(3). 16 indexed citations

Diget, C. Aa., et al.. (2017). Cycling the hot CNO: a teaching methodology. Physics Education. 53(2). 24001–24001. 1 indexed citations

10.

Howard, A., et al.. (2015). Na23(α,p)Mg26Reaction Rate at Astrophysically Relevant Energies. Physical Review Letters. 115(5). 52701–52701. 9 indexed citations

11.

Bentley, M. A., et al.. (2015). Isospin-breaking interactions studied through mirror energy differences. Physical Review C. 92(2). 18 indexed citations

12.

Kirsebom, O. S., M. Alcorta, M. J. G. Borge, et al.. (2012). Improved Limit on DirectαDecay of the Hoyle State. Physical Review Letters. 108(20). 202501–202501. 41 indexed citations

13.

Tengblad, O. & C. Aa. Diget. (2012). Beta-delayed (multi-)particle decay studies. Hyperfine Interactions. 223(1-3). 81–101. 4 indexed citations

14.

Riley, L. A., P. Adrich, T. Baugher, et al.. (2012). γ-ray spectroscopy of one-proton knockout from45Cl. Physical Review C. 86(4). 4 indexed citations

15.

Beer, C., A. M. Laird, A. St. J. Murphy, et al.. (2011). Direct measurement of theF18(p,α)O15reaction at nova temperatures. Physical Review C. 83(4). 24 indexed citations

16.

Weißhaar, D., A. Gade, T. Glasmacher, et al.. (2010). CAESAR—A high-efficiency CsI(Na) scintillator array for in-beam γ‐ray spectroscopy with fast rare-isotope beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 624(3). 615–623. 33 indexed citations

17.

Gade, A., P. Adrich, D. Bazin, et al.. (2009). In-Beamγ-Ray Spectroscopy of Very Neutron-Rich Nuclei: Excited States inS46andAr48. Physical Review Letters. 102(18). 182502–182502. 20 indexed citations

18.

Riley, L. A., P. Adrich, T. Baugher, et al.. (2008). d5/2proton hole strength in neutron-richP43: Shell structure and nuclear shapes nearN=28. Physical Review C. 78(1). 18 indexed citations

19.

Prezado, Yolanda, C. Aa. Diget, L. M. Fraile, et al.. (2005). Low-lying resonance states in the 9Be continuum. Physics Letters B. 618(1-4). 43–50. 17 indexed citations

20.

Bergmann, U.C., C. Aa. Diget, K. Riisager, et al.. (2003). Beta-decay properties of the neutron-rich 94–99Kr and 142–147Xe isotopes. Nuclear Physics A. 714(1-2). 21–43. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact