C. A. Tulk

3.7k total citations
92 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

C. A. Tulk is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Geophysics and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, C. A. Tulk has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Materials Chemistry, 35 papers in Geophysics and 25 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in C. A. Tulk's work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (35 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (25 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (21 papers). C. A. Tulk is often cited by papers focused on High-pressure geophysics and materials (35 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (25 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (21 papers). C. A. Tulk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. C. A. Tulk's co-authors include D. D. Klug, M. Guthrie, Jamie J. Molaison, Chris J. Benmore, John A. Ripmeester, Abhay Shukla, P. M. Platzman, D. R. Hamann, B. Barbiellini and E. D. Isaacs and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

C. A. Tulk

91 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. A. Tulk United States 28 1.3k 808 560 531 507 92 2.8k
M. Guthrie United States 29 1.5k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 464 0.8× 534 1.0× 586 1.2× 74 3.0k
Ho‐kwang Mao United States 27 1.5k 1.2× 1.4k 1.7× 592 1.1× 423 0.8× 125 0.2× 44 2.9k
Christoph G. Salzmann United Kingdom 39 3.2k 2.5× 923 1.1× 1.0k 1.8× 322 0.6× 602 1.2× 118 5.3k
T. Matsuo Japan 24 1.1k 0.8× 218 0.3× 463 0.8× 298 0.6× 138 0.3× 88 1.9k
Christian Sternemann Germany 30 1.9k 1.5× 363 0.4× 513 0.9× 132 0.2× 118 0.2× 142 3.6k
M. Sakashita Japan 25 574 0.4× 873 1.1× 557 1.0× 284 0.5× 73 0.1× 53 1.8k
A. Dominic Fortes United Kingdom 31 1.0k 0.8× 624 0.8× 275 0.5× 287 0.5× 85 0.2× 130 2.5k
W. Press Germany 37 2.1k 1.6× 602 0.7× 1.9k 3.3× 669 1.3× 88 0.2× 171 4.4k
Timothy A. Strobel United States 36 1.9k 1.5× 725 0.9× 575 1.0× 1.2k 2.2× 78 0.2× 105 4.1k
Alexander Kurnosov Germany 26 794 0.6× 1.3k 1.6× 179 0.3× 282 0.5× 170 0.3× 100 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by C. A. Tulk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. A. Tulk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. A. Tulk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. A. Tulk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. A. Tulk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. A. Tulk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. A. Tulk. The network helps show where C. A. Tulk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. A. Tulk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. A. Tulk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. A. Tulk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. A. Tulk. C. A. Tulk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Yuemei, et al.. (2023). Spin–Phonon Interactions and Anharmonic Lattice Dynamics in Fe3GeTe2. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(8). 5 indexed citations
2.
Andersson, Ove, Thomas Loerting, Marion Bauer, et al.. (2023). Neutron scattering study of polyamorphic THF·17(H2O) – toward a generalized picture of amorphous states and structures derived from clathrate hydrates. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 25(21). 14981–14991. 3 indexed citations
3.
Leitão, Alexandre A., Ove Andersson, C. A. Tulk, et al.. (2021). Structural investigation of three distinct amorphous forms of Ar hydrate. RSC Advances. 11(49). 30744–30754. 7 indexed citations
4.
Tulk, C. A., et al.. (2019). Absence of amorphous forms when ice is compressed at low temperature. Nature. 569(7757). 542–545. 50 indexed citations
5.
Calder, Stuart, Ke An, R. Boehler, et al.. (2018). A suite-level review of the neutron powder diffraction instruments at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Review of Scientific Instruments. 89(9). 92701–92701. 102 indexed citations
6.
Sun, Jiangman, Xiao Dong, Yajie Wang, et al.. (2017). Pressure‐Induced Polymerization of Acetylene: Structure‐Directed Stereoselectivity and a Possible Route to Graphane. Angewandte Chemie. 129(23). 6653–6657. 9 indexed citations
7.
Li, Xiang, Maria Baldini, Tao Wang, et al.. (2017). Mechanochemical Synthesis of Carbon Nanothread Single Crystals. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139(45). 16343–16349. 90 indexed citations
8.
Sun, Jiangman, Xiao Dong, Yajie Wang, et al.. (2017). Pressure‐Induced Polymerization of Acetylene: Structure‐Directed Stereoselectivity and a Possible Route to Graphane. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 56(23). 6553–6557. 37 indexed citations
9.
Song, Gian, Jiao Lin, Jean-Christophe Bilheux, et al.. (2017). Characterization of Crystallographic Structures Using Bragg-Edge Neutron Imaging at the Spallation Neutron Source. Journal of Imaging. 3(4). 65–65. 30 indexed citations
10.
Tulk, C. A., Shinichi Machida, D. D. Klug, et al.. (2014). The structure of CO2 hydrate between 0.7 and 1.0 GPa. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 141(17). 174503–174503. 19 indexed citations
11.
Klug, D. D., et al.. (2013). ChemInform Abstract: Low‐Pressure Synthesis and Characterization of Hydrogen‐Filled Ice Ic.. ChemInform. 44(18). 1 indexed citations
12.
Hirai, Shigeto, A. M. dos Santos, M. C. Shapiro, et al.. (2013). Giant atomic displacement at a magnetic phase transition in metastable Mn3O4. Physical Review B. 87(1). 16 indexed citations
13.
Santos, A. M. dos, Juske Horita, C. A. Tulk, Bryan C. Chakoumakos, & V. B. Polyakov. (2010). Combined high-pressure neutron and X-ray diffraction study of H-D substitution effects on brucite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 74(12). 244. 1 indexed citations
14.
Zhang, Chao, Wei Yi, Liling Sun, et al.. (2009). Pressure-induced lattice collapse in the tetragonal phase of single-crystallineFe1.05Te. Physical Review B. 80(14). 24 indexed citations
15.
Neuefeind, Jörg, K.K. Chipley, C. A. Tulk, J.M. Simonson, & M. J. Winokur. (2006). A nanoscale ordered materials diffractometer for the SNS. Physica B Condensed Matter. 385-386. 1066–1069. 6 indexed citations
16.
Benmore, Chris J., R. Hart, Qiang Mei, et al.. (2005). Intermediate range chemical ordering in amorphous and liquid water, Si, and Ge. Physical Review B. 72(13). 45 indexed citations
17.
Tulk, C. A., et al.. (2002). The low-frequency density of states for amorphous and crystalline ices. Applied Physics A. 74(0). s1185–s1187. 7 indexed citations
18.
Shpakov, V. P., et al.. (1998). Elastic moduli calculation and instability in structure I methane clathrate hydrate. Chemical Physics Letters. 282(2). 107–114. 73 indexed citations
19.
Tulk, C. A., R. Gagnon, H. Kiefte, & M. J. Clouter. (1997). The pressure dependence of the elastic constants of ice III and ice VI. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 107(24). 10684–10690. 14 indexed citations
20.
Tulk, C. A., R. Gagnon, H. Kiefte, & M. J. Clouter. (1996). Elastic constants of ice VI by Brillouin spectroscopy. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 104(20). 7854–7859. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026