B.W. Riemer

951 total citations
65 papers, 662 citations indexed

About

B.W. Riemer is a scholar working on Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, B.W. Riemer has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 662 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Radiation, 37 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 20 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in B.W. Riemer's work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (43 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (21 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (12 papers). B.W. Riemer is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Physics and Applications (43 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (21 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (12 papers). B.W. Riemer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. B.W. Riemer's co-authors include John Haines, David A. McClintock, M.L. Santella, Zhili Feng, S. S. Babu, John Hunn, P.D. Ferguson, Franz X. Gallmeier, Hiroyuki Kogawa and Chen‐Chi Tsai and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

B.W. Riemer

64 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B.W. Riemer United States 15 375 313 259 146 142 65 662
G.S. Bauer Switzerland 15 312 0.8× 459 1.5× 303 1.2× 107 0.7× 65 0.5× 40 726
Hirotaka Sato Japan 19 845 2.3× 293 0.9× 303 1.2× 141 1.0× 57 0.4× 86 1.1k
L.W. Packer United Kingdom 14 348 0.9× 763 2.4× 470 1.8× 179 1.2× 85 0.6× 68 1.0k
Hiroyuki Kogawa Japan 16 656 1.7× 545 1.7× 415 1.6× 71 0.5× 154 1.1× 78 870
Kentaro Ochiai Japan 15 357 1.0× 615 2.0× 397 1.5× 45 0.3× 61 0.4× 116 828
Yasushi Iwata Japan 13 87 0.2× 210 0.7× 81 0.3× 126 0.9× 118 0.8× 51 526
R.F. Mattas United States 17 87 0.2× 609 1.9× 221 0.9× 130 0.9× 101 0.7× 68 758
A. Aiello Italy 20 93 0.2× 933 3.0× 534 2.1× 148 1.0× 119 0.8× 45 1.1k
D. Rapisarda Spain 20 131 0.3× 930 3.0× 602 2.3× 108 0.7× 102 0.7× 90 1.2k
Frederik Arbeiter Germany 17 300 0.8× 781 2.5× 534 2.1× 160 1.1× 40 0.3× 106 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by B.W. Riemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.W. Riemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.W. Riemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.W. Riemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.W. Riemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.W. Riemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.W. Riemer. The network helps show where B.W. Riemer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.W. Riemer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.W. Riemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.W. Riemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B.W. Riemer. B.W. Riemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kalina, Karl A., et al.. (2025). A dual-stage constitutive modeling framework based on finite strain data-driven identification and physics-augmented neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 447. 118289–118289. 1 indexed citations
2.
Iverson, Erik B., et al.. (2023). Real-time monitoring of the orthohydrogen fraction in a liquid hydrogen moderator. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 547. 165176–165176. 3 indexed citations
3.
Liu, Yun, et al.. (2018). Strain Measurement in the Spallation Target Using High-Radiation-Tolerant Fiber Sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal. 18(9). 3645–3653. 18 indexed citations
4.
Galambos, J., M. Champion, M. Howell, et al.. (2018). Status of the SNS Proton Power Upgrade Project. JACOW. 24–28. 1 indexed citations
5.
Blokland, Willem, et al.. (2017). Strain and Temperature Measurements From the SNS Mercury Target Vessel During High Intensity Beam Pulses. JACOW. 1230–1233. 1 indexed citations
6.
Blokland, Willem, et al.. (2016). Radiation-Resistant Fiber Optic Strain Sensors for SNS Target Instrumentation. JACOW. 371–373. 1 indexed citations
7.
McClintock, David A., et al.. (2014). Post-irradiation tensile properties of the first and second operational target modules at the Spallation Neutron Source. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 450(1-3). 130–140. 20 indexed citations
8.
Wu, Xiongjun, et al.. (2014). Gas Bubble Size Measurements in Liquid Mercury Using an Acoustic Spectrometer. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 136(3). 7 indexed citations
9.
Haines, John, et al.. (2014). Spallation neutron source target station design, development, and commissioning. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 764. 94–115. 28 indexed citations
10.
McClintock, David A., et al.. (2014). Characterization of irradiated AISI 316L stainless steel disks removed from the Spallation Neutron Source. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 450(1-3). 147–162. 16 indexed citations
11.
Riemer, B.W., et al.. (2013). Target Operational Experience at the Spallation Neutron Source. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations
12.
Riemer, B.W., David L. West, Shoichi Hasegawa, et al.. (2013). Small gas bubble experiment for mitigation of cavitation damage and pressure waves in short-pulse mercury spallation targets. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 450(1-3). 192–203. 14 indexed citations
13.
Paquit, Vincent, et al.. (2010). Creating Small Gas Bubbles in Flowing Mercury Using Turbulence at an Orifice. 1–6. 2 indexed citations
14.
Chitnis, Parag V., et al.. (2010). Detecting cavitation in mercury exposed to a high-energy pulsed proton beam. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 127(4). 2231–2239. 9 indexed citations
15.
Kogawa, Hiroyuki, et al.. (2008). Numerical study on pressure wave propagation in a mercury loop. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 377(1). 195–200. 3 indexed citations
16.
Riemer, B.W., et al.. (2007). Proton Radiography Experiment to Visualize Gas Bubbles in Mercury. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations
17.
Ibrahim, Ashraf, et al.. (2007). CFD Validation of Gas Injection Into Stagnant Water. 463–469. 1 indexed citations
18.
Riemer, B.W., et al.. (2002). ITER vacuum vessel structural analysis. 1. 373–376. 1 indexed citations
19.
Taylor, Douglas, et al.. (2002). Heating profiles on ICRF antenna Faraday shields. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 98–102. 1 indexed citations
20.
Ice, Gene E., B.W. Riemer, & Ali M. Khounsary. (1996). <title>Monochromators for small cross-section x-ray beams from high heat flux synchrotron sources</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2856. 226–235. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026