Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Segmentation of festival motivation by nationality and satisfaction
2003515 citationsBruce E. Wicks et al.Tourism Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bruce E. Wicks
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce E. Wicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce E. Wicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce E. Wicks more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce E. Wicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce E. Wicks. The network helps show where Bruce E. Wicks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce E. Wicks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce E. Wicks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce E. Wicks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce E. Wicks. Bruce E. Wicks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wicks, Bruce E., et al.. (2008). Using land manager workshops to develop serrated tussock best management practices.. 464–466.2 indexed citations
5.
Backman, Kenneth F., et al.. (1997). Coproduction of recreation services.. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 15(3). 58–75.26 indexed citations
6.
Wicks, Bruce E. & Cheryl K. Baldwin. (1997). The cost-accuracy trade-off: testing the utility of nonprobability samples in tourism marketing research.. Tourism Analysis. 2(1). 1–8.9 indexed citations
7.
Wicks, Bruce E., et al.. (1996). Improving African American Survey Response Rates for Leisure Marketing and Planning Studies. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 14(2). 1–15.5 indexed citations
8.
McKinney, William R., et al.. (1995). Theory and Application of Triangulation to Public Park and Recreation Planning. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 13(3). 26–40.1 indexed citations
Wicks, Bruce E., et al.. (1993). Geographic Information Systems (GIS): a tool for marketing, managing, and planning municipal park systems.. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 11(1). 9–23.6 indexed citations
14.
Wicks, Bruce E. & Daniel R. Fesenmaier. (1993). A comparison of visitor and vendor perceptions of service quality at a special event.. 1(1). 19–26.14 indexed citations
15.
Wicks, Bruce E.. (1992). A case for considering social equity.. 50(4). 10–17.1 indexed citations
Wicks, Bruce E.. (1987). The Allocation of Recreation and Park Resources: The Courts' Intervention. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 5(3).8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.