Brian McCourt

1.1k total citations
8 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

Brian McCourt is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Health Information Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian McCourt has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Health Information Management and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Brian McCourt's work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Brian McCourt is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Brian McCourt collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Brian McCourt's co-authors include Ellen J. Anderson, Janet E. Hall, David Schoenfeld, Ann E. Taylor, Judith Adams, Kathryn A. Martin, Laura H. Aberle, Karen Chiswell, Asba Tasneem and Ricardo Pietrobon and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and American Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Brian McCourt

8 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brian McCourt United States	6	357	312	94	82	42	8	585
Paul R. Sutton United States	6	132 0.4×	75 0.2×	171 1.8×	349 4.3×	8 0.2×	9	585
Jean‐François Éthier Canada	13	26 0.1×	147 0.5×	210 2.2×	16 0.2×	53 1.3×	42	543
Binayak Sinha India	16	98 0.3×	70 0.2×	192 2.0×	679 8.3×	46 1.1×	56	1.1k
R. R. O’Moore Ireland	14	85 0.2×	62 0.2×	107 1.1×	39 0.5×	4 0.1×	47	734
Arthur F. Harralson United States	14	32 0.1×	134 0.4×	62 0.7×	43 0.5×	28 0.7×	31	525
Daniel J. Nigrin United States	15	8 0.0×	179 0.6×	117 1.2×	83 1.0×	58 1.4×	22	797
Hongli Ma China	15	121 0.3×	74 0.2×	68 0.7×	20 0.2×	14 0.3×	52	479
Salim Janmohamed United Kingdom	9	6 0.0×	111 0.4×	121 1.3×	135 1.6×	38 0.9×	13	684
PC Hannaford United Kingdom	7	33 0.1×	102 0.3×	13 0.1×	34 0.4×	74 1.8×	7	450

Countries citing papers authored by Brian McCourt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian McCourt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian McCourt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian McCourt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian McCourt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian McCourt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian McCourt. The network helps show where Brian McCourt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian McCourt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian McCourt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian McCourt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian McCourt. Brian McCourt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Perakslis, Eric, Stuart J. Knechtle, Brian McCourt, Raymond Lynch, & Brianna Doby. (2023). Doing it right: Caring for and protecting patient information for US organ donors and transplant recipients. Patterns. 4(4). 100734–100734. 2 indexed citations

Slight, Sarah P., Eta S. Berner, William Galanter, et al.. (2015). Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: Experiences From the Field and Future Opportunities. JMIR Medical Informatics. 3(3). e30–e30. 49 indexed citations

Pencina, Michael, et al.. (2015). Supporting open access to clinical trial data for researchers: The Duke Clinical Research Institute–Bristol-Myers Squibb Supporting Open Access to Researchers Initiative. American Heart Journal. 172. 64–69. 20 indexed citations

Tasneem, Asba, et al.. (2012). The Database for Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and Subsequent Regrouping by Clinical Specialty. PLoS ONE. 7(3). e33677–e33677. 114 indexed citations

Nahm, Meredith, Anita Walden, Brian McCourt, et al.. (2010). Standardising clinical data elements. 3(4). 314–314. 7 indexed citations

McCourt, Brian, Robert A. Harrington, Keith A.A. Fox, et al.. (2007). Data Standards: At the Intersection of Sites, Clinical Research Networks, and Standards Development Initiatives. Drug Information Journal. 41(3). 393–404. 11 indexed citations

Hammond, W. Ed & Brian McCourt. (2007). Making sense of standards.. PubMed. 78(8). 60–1. 1 indexed citations

Taylor, Ann E., Brian McCourt, Kathryn A. Martin, et al.. (1997). Determinants of Abnormal Gonadotropin Secretion in Clinically Defined Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 82(7). 2248–2256. 381 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact