Brian J. Spiesman

859 total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Brian J. Spiesman is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian J. Spiesman has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 11 papers in Plant Science and 10 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Brian J. Spiesman's work include Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (8 papers). Brian J. Spiesman is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (8 papers). Brian J. Spiesman collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Brian J. Spiesman's co-authors include Brian D. Inouye, Claudio Gratton, Graeme S. Cumming, Brian McCornack, Randall D. Jackson, Yichao Rui, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Matthew D. Ruark, Steve W. Culman and Chao Liang and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Brian J. Spiesman

23 papers receiving 578 citations

Hit Papers

Persistent soil carbon en... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75 100

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brian J. Spiesman United States 11 307 187 173 172 141 23 592
Sarah Cusser United States 11 241 0.8× 132 0.7× 118 0.7× 154 0.9× 65 0.5× 17 416
Sophie Kratschmer Austria 14 436 1.4× 340 1.8× 170 1.0× 289 1.7× 148 1.0× 26 751
Aaron L. Iverson United States 11 294 1.0× 238 1.3× 166 1.0× 224 1.3× 150 1.1× 29 721
Daniele Sommaggio Italy 15 556 1.8× 204 1.1× 164 0.9× 420 2.4× 227 1.6× 47 838
Muriel Guernion France 8 349 1.1× 287 1.5× 143 0.8× 190 1.1× 159 1.1× 11 702
Rahayu Widyastuti Indonesia 12 219 0.7× 163 0.9× 116 0.7× 90 0.5× 285 2.0× 72 651
Martin Lappage United Kingdom 7 231 0.8× 124 0.7× 63 0.4× 145 0.8× 78 0.6× 9 426
Sean L. Tuck United Kingdom 3 225 0.7× 261 1.4× 172 1.0× 120 0.7× 240 1.7× 3 683
Flávia Moreira Mota e Mota United Kingdom 1 198 0.6× 212 1.1× 130 0.8× 113 0.7× 191 1.4× 2 548
Soraya Rouifed France 12 332 1.1× 262 1.4× 298 1.7× 69 0.4× 170 1.2× 23 703

Countries citing papers authored by Brian J. Spiesman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian J. Spiesman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian J. Spiesman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian J. Spiesman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian J. Spiesman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian J. Spiesman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian J. Spiesman. The network helps show where Brian J. Spiesman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian J. Spiesman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian J. Spiesman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian J. Spiesman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian J. Spiesman. Brian J. Spiesman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spiesman, Brian J., et al.. (2024). Deep learning for identifying bee species from images of wings and pinned specimens. PLoS ONE. 19(5). e0303383–e0303383. 3 indexed citations
2.
Iuliano, Benjamin, Claudio Gratton, Tania N. Kim, & Brian J. Spiesman. (2024). Semi‐natural habitat, but not aphid amount or continuity, predicts lady beetle abundance across agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 61(8). 1881–1893. 1 indexed citations
3.
Spiesman, Brian J., et al.. (2023). Computer vision model for sorghum aphid detection using deep learning. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 13. 100652–100652. 6 indexed citations
4.
Rui, Yichao, Randall D. Jackson, M. Francesca Cotrufo, et al.. (2022). Persistent soil carbon enhanced in Mollisols by well-managed grasslands but not annual grain or dairy forage cropping systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(7). 112 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Spiesman, Brian J., et al.. (2022). Image classification of sugarcane aphid density using deep convolutional neural networks. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100089–100089. 23 indexed citations
6.
Kim, Tania N., Yury V. Bukhman, Michelle A. Jusino, et al.. (2022). Using high-throughput amplicon sequencing to determine diet of generalist lady beetles in agricultural landscapes. Biological Control. 170. 104920–104920. 4 indexed citations
7.
Spiesman, Brian J., et al.. (2022). Image Classification of Sugarcane Aphid Density Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
8.
Spiesman, Brian J., Claudio Gratton, Richard G. Hatfield, et al.. (2021). Assessing the potential for deep learning and computer vision to identify bumble bee species from images. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 7580–7580. 66 indexed citations
9.
Spiesman, Brian J., Benjamin Iuliano, & Claudio Gratton. (2020). Temporal Resource Continuity Increases Predator Abundance in a Metapopulation Model: Insights for Conservation and Biocontrol. Land. 9(12). 479–479. 6 indexed citations
10.
Spiesman, Brian J., Ashley B. Bennett, Rufus Isaacs, & Claudio Gratton. (2018). Harvesting effects on wild bee communities in bioenergy grasslands depend on nesting guild. Ecological Applications. 29(2). e01828–e01828. 6 indexed citations
11.
12.
Spiesman, Brian J. & Claudio Gratton. (2016). Flexible foraging shapes the topology of plant–pollinator interaction networks. Ecology. 97(6). 1431–1441. 34 indexed citations
13.
Spiesman, Brian J., Ashley B. Bennett, Rufus Isaacs, & Claudio Gratton. (2016). Bumble bee colony growth and reproduction depend on local flower dominance and natural habitat area in the surrounding landscape. Biological Conservation. 206. 217–223. 39 indexed citations
14.
15.
Bartrons, Mireia, Claudio Gratton, Brian J. Spiesman, & M. Jake Vander Zanden. (2015). Taking the trophic bypass: aquatic‐terrestrial linkage reduces methylmercury in a terrestrial food web. Ecological Applications. 25(1). 151–159. 29 indexed citations
16.
Spiesman, Brian J. & Brian D. Inouye. (2014). The consequences of multiple indirect pathways of interaction for species coexistence. Theoretical Ecology. 8(2). 225–232. 4 indexed citations
17.
Spiesman, Brian J. & Brian D. Inouye. (2013). Habitat loss alters the architecture of plant–pollinator interaction networks. Ecology. 94(12). 2688–2696. 106 indexed citations
18.
Spiesman, Brian J.. (2012). Effects of Landscape Structure on Biodiversity, Network Architecture, and Ecosystem Function. 1 indexed citations
19.
Spiesman, Brian J. & Graeme S. Cumming. (2007). Communities in context: the influences of multiscale environmental variation on local ant community structure. Landscape Ecology. 23(3). 313–325. 46 indexed citations
20.
Cumming, Graeme S. & Brian J. Spiesman. (2006). Regional problems need integrated solutions: Pest management and conservation biology in agroecosystems. Biological Conservation. 131(4). 533–543. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026