Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Prospective Multicenter Study of Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Heart Disease
2001829 citationsSamuel C. Siu, Mathew Sermer et al.Circulationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Brian C. Morton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian C. Morton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian C. Morton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian C. Morton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian C. Morton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian C. Morton. The network helps show where Brian C. Morton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian C. Morton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian C. Morton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian C. Morton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brian C. Morton. Brian C. Morton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mensah, James E., et al.. (2012). SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF BPH IN GHANA: A NEED TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE.. PubMed. 89(7). 241–5.7 indexed citations
3.
Morton, Brian C., et al.. (2001). Direct drainage of the right pulmonary veins into the coronary sinus with intact interatrial septum: a case report.. PubMed. 17(7). 807–9.5 indexed citations
4.
Siu, Samuel C., Mathew Sermer, Jack M. Colman, et al.. (2001). Prospective Multicenter Study of Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Heart Disease. Circulation. 104(5). 515–521.829 indexed citations breakdown →
Skanes, Allan C., Brian C. Morton, Manfred S. Green, & Antony Tang. (1997). Torsade de pointes with amiodarone in a patient with previous torsade during beta-receptor blockade.. PubMed. 13(4). 383–6.7 indexed citations
Koshal, Arvind, et al.. (1987). Temporary diastolic noncompliance with preserved systolic function after heart transplantation.. PubMed. 19(4). 3444–7.23 indexed citations
14.
Morton, Brian C., et al.. (1984). Magnesium therapy in acute myocardial infarction--a double-blind study.. PubMed. 3(4-6). 346–52.67 indexed citations
15.
Morton, Brian C. & Donald S. Beanlands. (1984). Complications of cardiac catheterization: one centre's experience.. PubMed. 131(8). 889–92.11 indexed citations
Bédard, P, et al.. (1977). Myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass: factors influencing its occurrence.. PubMed. 20(2). 135–9.8 indexed citations
20.
Morch, John E., Brian C. Morton, Peter R. McLaughlin, et al.. (1974). Late results of aortocoronary bypass grafts in 100 patients with stable angina pectoris.. PubMed. 111(6). 529–32.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.