Brett J. Peters

1.3k total citations
30 papers, 593 citations indexed

About

Brett J. Peters is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brett J. Peters has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 593 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Social Psychology, 12 papers in Clinical Psychology and 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Brett J. Peters's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). Brett J. Peters is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). Brett J. Peters collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Brett J. Peters's co-authors include Jeremy P. Jamieson, Nickola C. Overall, Harry T. Reis, Shelly L. Gable, Matthew K. Nock, Miranda Beltzer, Jeffry A. Simpson, Linda D. Cameron, Piercarlo Valdesolo and Rick Dale and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Psychophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Brett J. Peters

29 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brett J. Peters United States 13 332 221 217 104 102 30 593
Lizbeth Benson United States 12 290 0.9× 267 1.2× 172 0.8× 107 1.0× 64 0.6× 31 601
Jennifer L. Trew Canada 9 163 0.5× 286 1.3× 249 1.1× 94 0.9× 91 0.9× 13 552
Rebekka Weidmann Switzerland 12 256 0.8× 145 0.7× 149 0.7× 52 0.5× 96 0.9× 42 457
João F. Guassi Moreira United States 13 220 0.7× 300 1.4× 186 0.9× 68 0.7× 71 0.7× 36 588
Yusuke Takahashi Japan 16 185 0.6× 390 1.8× 262 1.2× 105 1.0× 71 0.7× 45 669
Katrina Koslov United States 7 195 0.6× 131 0.6× 144 0.7× 94 0.9× 146 1.4× 9 504
Karen Brans Belgium 8 227 0.7× 300 1.4× 348 1.6× 85 0.8× 108 1.1× 10 654
Jessica P. Lougheed Canada 15 256 0.8× 505 2.3× 197 0.9× 53 0.5× 90 0.9× 31 698
Alithe L. van den Akker Netherlands 18 255 0.8× 739 3.3× 183 0.8× 56 0.5× 97 1.0× 41 913
Myoung‐Ho Hyun South Korea 9 131 0.4× 207 0.9× 99 0.5× 71 0.7× 117 1.1× 66 421

Countries citing papers authored by Brett J. Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brett J. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett J. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett J. Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brett J. Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett J. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett J. Peters. The network helps show where Brett J. Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brett J. Peters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brett J. Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brett J. Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brett J. Peters. Brett J. Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peters, Brett J., et al.. (2025). Intimate partner violence victimization, habitual emotion regulation strategies, and health during COVID-19.. Psychology of Violence. 15(3). 305–315.
2.
Thorson, Katherine R., et al.. (2024). Behavioral variability in physiological synchrony during future-based conversations between romantic partners.. Emotion. 25(1). 186–197. 1 indexed citations
3.
Peters, Brett J., et al.. (2023). Sense of power and markers of challenge and threat during extra‐dyadic problem discussions with romantic partners. Psychophysiology. 60(11). e14379–e14379. 4 indexed citations
5.
Peters, Brett J., et al.. (2022). The intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of a new experimental manipulation of co-rumination.. Emotion. 23(4). 1190–1201. 14 indexed citations
6.
Misiak, Michał, et al.. (2022). Evil joy is hard to share: Negative affect attenuates interpersonal capitalizing on immoral deeds.. Emotion. 23(1). 230–242. 1 indexed citations
7.
Peters, Brett J., et al.. (2021). Examining associations between COVID-19 stressors, intimate partner violence, health, and health behaviors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 38(8). 2291–2307. 29 indexed citations
8.
Tomlinson, Jennifer M., Brooke C. Feeney, & Brett J. Peters. (2020). Growing into retirement: Longitudinal evidence for the importance of partner support for self-expansion.. Psychology and Aging. 35(7). 1041–1049. 8 indexed citations
10.
Hayes, Christina L., Brett J. Peters, & Jane A. Foster. (2020). Microbes and mental health: Can the microbiome help explain clinical heterogeneity in psychiatry?. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 58. 100849–100849. 13 indexed citations
11.
Overall, Nickola C., Margaret S. Clark, Garth J. O. Fletcher, Brett J. Peters, & Valerie T. Chang. (2019). Does expressing emotions enhance perceptual accuracy of negative emotions during relationship interactions?. Emotion. 20(3). 353–367. 19 indexed citations
12.
Peters, Brett J., Nickola C. Overall, Linda D. Cameron, et al.. (2019). Do habitual emotional suppression measures predict response-focused situational suppression during social interactions?. Emotion. 20(6). 1005–1019. 4 indexed citations
13.
Peters, Brett J. & Nickola C. Overall. (2019). Perceptions of romantic partners’ emotional suppression are more biased than accurate.. Emotion. 20(8). 1485–1489. 10 indexed citations
14.
Peters, Brett J., Harry T. Reis, & Shelly L. Gable. (2018). Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 12(7). 69 indexed citations
15.
Peters, Brett J., et al.. (2018). Preregistered Analysis Plan. 1 indexed citations
16.
Peters, Brett J., Harry T. Reis, & Jeremy P. Jamieson. (2017). Cardiovascular indexes of threat impair responsiveness in situations of conflicting interests. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 123. 1–7. 17 indexed citations
17.
Peters, Brett J., Matthew D. Hammond, Harry T. Reis, & Jeremy P. Jamieson. (2016). The consequences of having a dominant romantic partner on testosterone responses during a social interaction. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 74. 308–315. 8 indexed citations
18.
Jamieson, Jeremy P., et al.. (2016). Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Performance and Reduces Evaluation Anxiety in Classroom Exam Situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 7(6). 579–587. 121 indexed citations
19.
Peters, Brett J. & Jeremy P. Jamieson. (2016). The consequences of suppressing affective displays in romantic relationships: A challenge and threat perspective.. Emotion. 16(7). 1050–1066. 47 indexed citations
20.
Beltzer, Miranda, Matthew K. Nock, Brett J. Peters, & Jeremy P. Jamieson. (2014). Rethinking butterflies: The affective, physiological, and performance effects of reappraising arousal during social evaluation.. Emotion. 14(4). 761–768. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026