Brent Bill
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
- Cell Biology 11
- Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications 11
-
- Congenital heart defects research 4
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 3
- RNA Research and Splicing 2
- Co-authors
- Stephen C. Ekker (7 shared papers)Lisa A. Schimmenti (5 shared papers)Daniel H. Geschwind (2 shared papers)Karl J. Clark (2 shared papers)Andrew M. Petzold (1 shared paper)Adam C. Roberts (3 shared papers)David L. Glanzman (3 shared papers)Vladimir Korzh (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)Zebrafish (2 papers)Gene (1 paper)International review of neurobiology (1 paper)Ecological Engineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeGermany
In The Last Decade
Brent Bill
20 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Cell Biology 474
- Developmental Neuroscience 77
- Genetics 362
- Cognitive Neuroscience 244
- Molecular Biology 761
Countries citing papers authored by Brent Bill
This map shows the geographic impact of Brent Bill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brent Bill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brent Bill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brent Bill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brent Bill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brent Bill. The network helps show where Brent Bill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brent Bill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 340 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 147 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 130 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 116 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 88 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 85 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 77 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 68 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Brent Bill
Brent Bill is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (11 papers), Congenital heart defects research (4 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (474 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (77 citations), Genetics (362 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (244 citations) and Molecular Biology (761 citations). Brent Bill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephen C. Ekker, Lisa A. Schimmenti, Daniel H. Geschwind, Karl J. Clark, Andrew M. Petzold, Adam C. Roberts, David L. Glanzman, Vladimir Korzh, Jennifer K. Lowe and Brent L. Fogel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Zebrafish, Gene, International review of neurobiology and Ecological Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.