Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study
2009832 citationsTudor–Eliade Ciuleanu, Thomas Brodowicz et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Branka Čučević
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Branka Čučević's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Branka Čučević with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Branka Čučević more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Branka Čučević. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Branka Čučević. The network helps show where Branka Čučević may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Branka Čučević
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Branka Čučević.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Branka Čučević based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Branka Čučević. Branka Čučević is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Jakopović, Marko, et al.. (2018). [CANCER PATIENTS FOLLOW-UP – CROATIAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICAL GUIDELINES Part V: melanoma, sarcomas, central nerve system tumors, lung cancer].. PubMed. 139(1-2). 17–23.2 indexed citations
Jakopović, Marko, et al.. (2014). Safety and efficacy of erlotinib in patients with squamous cell lung cancer. 44. 2722.2 indexed citations
7.
Popović‐Grle, Sanja, et al.. (2013). Waist circumference does not correlate with functional lung capacity in moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.. PubMed. 52(1). 69–77.2 indexed citations
Ciuleanu, Tudor–Eliade, Thomas Brodowicz, Christoph Zielinski, et al.. (2009). Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 374(9699). 1432–1440.832 indexed citations breakdown →
Rudan, Igor, Zrinka Biloglav, Ariana Vorko-Jović, et al.. (2006). Effects of inbreeding, endogamy, genetic admixture, and outbreeding on human health: a (1001 Dalmatians) study.. PubMed. 47(4). 601–10.38 indexed citations
Čučević, Branka, et al.. (2005). Gemcitabine in the first and second-line chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.. PubMed. 29(2). 583–8.2 indexed citations
Čučević, Branka, et al.. (1992). [Comparative analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy in pulmonary sarcoidosis].. PubMed. 43(1-2). 106–8.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.