Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets
2015375 citationsBrandon Sorbom, Justin Ball et al.Fusion Engineering and Designprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Brandon Sorbom
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Brandon Sorbom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brandon Sorbom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brandon Sorbom more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brandon Sorbom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brandon Sorbom. The network helps show where Brandon Sorbom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brandon Sorbom
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brandon Sorbom.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brandon Sorbom based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brandon Sorbom. Brandon Sorbom is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dinklage, A., R. J. Buttery, K. Crombé, et al.. (2025). Visions for fusion. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 67(6). 63701–63701.1 indexed citations
Greenwald, M., Zachary Hartwig, J. Irby, et al.. (2018). Performance Projections For SPARC. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018.
12.
Marmar, E., M. Greenwald, Zachary Hartwig, et al.. (2018). The high field tokamak path to fusion energy: C-Mod to SPARC to ARC. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018.1 indexed citations
13.
Mumgaard, R., M. Greenwald, Zachary Hartwig, et al.. (2017). The High Field Path to Practical Fusion Energy. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017.9 indexed citations
Mumgaard, R., Margaret Greenwald, J. P. Freidberg, et al.. (2016). Scoping study for compact high-field superconducting net energy tokamaks. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.1 indexed citations
16.
Sorbom, Brandon, Justin Ball, Timothy R. Palmer, et al.. (2015). ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets. Fusion Engineering and Design. 100. 378–405.375 indexed citations breakdown →
Sorbom, Brandon, Justin Ball, Timothy R. Palmer, et al.. (2014). ARC: A compact, high-field, disassemblable fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014.1 indexed citations
Sorbom, Brandon, Justin Ball, Harold Barnard, et al.. (2012). Liquid immersion blanket design for use in a compact modular fusion reactor. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 54.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.