Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical guidelines and rationale
19971.2k citationsL. Miller, Fiona Godlee et al.Gastroenterologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bond Jh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bond Jh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bond Jh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bond Jh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bond Jh. The network helps show where Bond Jh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bond Jh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bond Jh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bond Jh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bond Jh. Bond Jh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Jh, Bond. (2000). Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas.. PubMed. 11(4). 176–84.98 indexed citations
2.
Jh, Bond. (1999). Endoscopic screening of relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.. PubMed. 49(1). 131–2.2 indexed citations
3.
Jh, Bond. (1999). Flat adenomas exist in asymptomatic people: important implications for colorectal cancer screening programs.. PubMed. 50(4). 589–90.2 indexed citations
Jh, Bond, et al.. (1998). Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.. PubMed. 4(3). 431–7; quiz 438.2 indexed citations
6.
Miller, L., Fiona Godlee, CD Mulrow, et al.. (1997). Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 112(2). 594–642.1227 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Jh, Bond, Paul Rozen, Waye Jd, et al.. (1996). [Prevention of colorectal carcinoma. Current WHO guidelines for early detection of colorectal carcinoma. World Health Organization Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer].. PubMed. 26(3). 139–40, 143.3 indexed citations
8.
Winawer, Sidney J., Michael J. O’Brien, Jerome D. Waye, et al.. (1990). Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.. PubMed. 68(6). 789–95.78 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.