Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Towards carbon neutrality and China's 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sustainable urban development, and investment priorities
2021380 citationsCameron Hepburn, Ye Qi et al.Environmental Science and Ecotechnologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Ward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Ward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Ward more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Ward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Ward. The network helps show where Bob Ward may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bob Ward
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bob Ward.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bob Ward based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bob Ward. Bob Ward is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hepburn, Cameron, Ye Qi, Nicholas Stern, et al.. (2021). Towards carbon neutrality and China's 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sustainable urban development, and investment priorities. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology. 8. 100130–100130.380 indexed citations breakdown →
Howe, Glenn T., et al.. (2017). Climate-Smart Seedlot Selection Tool: Reforestation and Restoration for the 21st Century. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
5.
Ward, Bob. (2017). President Trump’s speech on the Paris Agreement was full of confusion and bogus claims. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
6.
Ward, Bob. (2016). Is there a link between climate change ‘sceptics’ and Brexit supporters?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
7.
Ward, Bob, et al.. (2015). Tracking intended nationally determined contributions: what are the implications for greenhouse gas emissions in 2030?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).10 indexed citations
8.
Stern, Nicholas, et al.. (2015). What will global annual emissions of greenhouse gases be in 2030, and will they be consistent with avoiding global warming of more than 2°C?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).5 indexed citations
9.
Ward, Bob, et al.. (2013). The climate change act: briefing note. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
Ward, Bob, et al.. (1985). Evaluation of Health Promotion. Occupational Health Nursing. 33(1). 9–14.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.