Blake K. Williamson

691 total citations
15 papers, 466 citations indexed

About

Blake K. Williamson is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Blake K. Williamson has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 466 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ophthalmology, 12 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Blake K. Williamson's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (11 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). Blake K. Williamson is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (11 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). Blake K. Williamson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Switzerland. Blake K. Williamson's co-authors include Syril Dorairaj, Mohammed K ElMallah, Malik Y. Kahook, Inder Paul Singh, Leonard K. Seibold, Gabriel Lazcano-Gómez, John P. Berdahl, Mark Gallardo, Jaime E. Dickerson and Steven D. Vold and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery and Eye.

In The Last Decade

Blake K. Williamson

15 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Blake K. Williamson United States 11 443 342 131 77 13 15 466
Gabriel Lazcano-Gómez United States 11 527 1.2× 388 1.1× 136 1.0× 73 0.9× 17 1.3× 25 547
Jella An United States 10 360 0.8× 220 0.6× 67 0.5× 88 1.1× 9 0.7× 30 411
Jesús Jiménez-Román Mexico 12 413 0.9× 289 0.8× 77 0.6× 69 0.9× 10 0.8× 33 442
Norbert Koerber United States 8 373 0.8× 332 1.0× 108 0.8× 66 0.9× 16 1.2× 14 379
Yasmine M. El Sayed Egypt 12 357 0.8× 278 0.8× 51 0.4× 61 0.8× 4 0.3× 30 400
Mohammed K ElMallah United States 8 322 0.7× 244 0.7× 103 0.8× 45 0.6× 8 0.6× 12 334
Laura Beltran-Agulló United Kingdom 11 366 0.8× 223 0.7× 80 0.6× 52 0.7× 8 0.6× 18 387
Giorgio Enrico Bravetti United States 11 403 0.9× 356 1.0× 54 0.4× 65 0.8× 7 0.5× 29 420
Ahmed Al Habash Saudi Arabia 10 303 0.7× 198 0.6× 28 0.2× 53 0.7× 8 0.6× 26 342
Pavi Agrawal United Kingdom 7 383 0.9× 290 0.8× 70 0.5× 58 0.8× 10 0.8× 9 407

Countries citing papers authored by Blake K. Williamson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Blake K. Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blake K. Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blake K. Williamson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Blake K. Williamson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blake K. Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blake K. Williamson. The network helps show where Blake K. Williamson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Blake K. Williamson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Blake K. Williamson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Blake K. Williamson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Blake K. Williamson. Blake K. Williamson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Shafer, Brian M., et al.. (2024). Understanding Perspectives on Presbyopia and Use of Pilocarpine HCl 1.25% Twice Daily from Participants of the Phase 3 VIRGO Study. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 13(6). 1723–1742. 1 indexed citations
2.
Williamson, Blake K., et al.. (2023). Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy with the OMNI System in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma: Two-Year Results from the ROMEO Study. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 17. 1057–1066. 13 indexed citations
3.
Sarkisian, Steven R., et al.. (2022). Canaloplasty and trabeculotomy with the OMNI® surgical system in OAG with prior trabecular microbypass stenting. International Ophthalmology. 43(5). 1647–1656. 6 indexed citations
4.
Bravetti, Giorgio Enrico, Kevin Gillmann, John P. Berdahl, et al.. (2022). Surgical outcomes of excisional goniotomy using the kahook dual blade in severe and refractory glaucoma: 12-month results. Eye. 37(8). 1608–1613. 7 indexed citations
5.
Dorairaj, Syril, Nathan M. Radcliffe, Davinder S. Grover, Jacob W. Brubaker, & Blake K. Williamson. (2022). A Review of Excisional Goniotomy Performed with the Kahook Dual Blade for Glaucoma Management. JOURNAL OF CURRENT GLAUCOMA PRACTICE. 16(1). 59–64. 7 indexed citations
6.
Samuelson, Thomas W., Inder Paul Singh, Blake K. Williamson, et al.. (2021). Quality of Life in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: An Analysis of VFQ-25 and OSDI From the iStent inject® Pivotal Trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 229. 220–229. 43 indexed citations
7.
Donaldson, Kendall E., et al.. (2021). Call to action: treating dry eye disease and setting the foundation for successful surgery. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 48(5). 623–629. 13 indexed citations
8.
ElMallah, Mohammed K, John P. Berdahl, Blake K. Williamson, et al.. (2020). <p>Twelve-Month Outcomes of Stand-Alone Excisional Goniotomy in Mild to Severe Glaucoma</p>. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 14. 1891–1897. 26 indexed citations
9.
Vold, Steven D., Gabriel S. Ferreira, Michael Hochman, et al.. (2020). Canaloplasty and trabeculotomy ab interno with the OMNI system combined with cataract surgery in open-angle glaucoma: 12-month outcomes from the ROMEO study. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 47(7). 907–915. 30 indexed citations
10.
Vold, Steven D., et al.. (2020). Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy with the OMNI System in Pseudophakic Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma: The ROMEO Study. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 4(2). 173–181. 43 indexed citations
11.
ElMallah, Mohammed K, Leonard K. Seibold, Malik Y. Kahook, et al.. (2019). 12-Month Retrospective Comparison of Kahook Dual Blade Excisional Goniotomy with Istent Trabecular Bypass Device Implantation in Glaucomatous Eyes at the Time of Cataract Surgery. Advances in Therapy. 36(9). 2515–2527. 60 indexed citations
12.
Berdahl, John P., Mark Gallardo, Mohammed K ElMallah, et al.. (2018). Six-Month Outcomes of Goniotomy Performed with the Kahook Dual Blade as a Stand-Alone Glaucoma Procedure. Advances in Therapy. 35(11). 2093–2102. 61 indexed citations
13.
Dorairaj, Syril, Malik Y. Kahook, Blake K. Williamson, et al.. (2018). A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 12. 791–797. 71 indexed citations
14.
Williamson, Blake K., Diane A. Blake, Justin K. Davis, et al.. (2018). The Effects of Glaucoma Drainage Devices on Oxygen Tension, Glycolytic Metabolites, and Metabolomics Profile of Aqueous Humor in the Rabbit. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 7(1). 14–14. 10 indexed citations
15.
Berdahl, John P., Gabriel Lazcano-Gómez, Blake K. Williamson, et al.. (2018). Goniotomy Using the Kahook Dual Blade in Severe and Refractory Glaucoma: 6-Month Outcomes. Journal of Glaucoma. 27(10). 849–855. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026