Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner
2014316 citationsBirte Glimm, Ian Horrocks et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Birte Glimm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birte Glimm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birte Glimm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birte Glimm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birte Glimm. The network helps show where Birte Glimm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birte Glimm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birte Glimm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birte Glimm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Birte Glimm. Birte Glimm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Confalonieri, Roberto, Oliver Kutz, Pietro Galliani, et al.. (2017). Coherence, Similarity, and Concept Generalisation. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 1879. 1–12.8 indexed citations
2.
Glimm, Birte, et al.. (2017). Testing the Adequacy of Automated Explanations of EL Subsumptions.. Description Logics.3 indexed citations
3.
Glimm, Birte, et al.. (2017). Incremental Materialization Update via Abstraction Refinement.. Description Logics.
4.
Low, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Ontology-supported Exploratory Search for Physical Training Exercises.. International Semantic Web Conference.1 indexed citations
5.
Behnke, Gregor, et al.. (2015). Integrating Ontologies and Planning for Cognitive Systems.. Description Logics.5 indexed citations
6.
Glimm, Birte, et al.. (2015). Completion Graph Caching for Expressive Description Logics.. Description Logics.2 indexed citations
7.
Glimm, Birte, et al.. (2014). Abstraction Refinement for Ontology Materialization.. Description Logics. 185–196.2 indexed citations
8.
Glimm, Birte, et al.. (2014). Optimised Absorption for Expressive Description Logics.. Description Logics. 324–335.3 indexed citations
9.
Glimm, Birte, et al.. (2013). Towards Explicative Inference for OWL.. Description Logics. 930–941.4 indexed citations
10.
Glimm, Birte, Yevgeny Kazakov, Ilianna Kollia, & Giorgos Stamou. (2013). Using the TBox to Optimise SPARQL Queries.. Description Logics. 181–196.1 indexed citations
11.
Rudolph, Sebastian, et al.. (2011). Reasoning-Supported Interactive Revision of Knowledge Bases.. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).2 indexed citations
12.
Glimm, Birte. (2011). Status QIO: An Update. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 745.4 indexed citations
13.
Kollia, Ilianna, Birte Glimm, & Ian Horrocks. (2011). Answering Queries over OWL Ontologies with SPARQL. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).3 indexed citations
14.
Glimm, Birte & Sebastian Rudolph. (2010). Status QIO : conjunctive query entailment is decidable. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 225–235.3 indexed citations
15.
Glimm, Birte, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia, & Peter F. Patel‐Schneider. (2009). A syntax for rules in OWL 2. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 529. 29–38.18 indexed citations
16.
Glimm, Birte, Ian Horrocks, & Ulrike Sattler. (2008). Unions of conjunctive queries in SHOQ. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 252–262.23 indexed citations
17.
Glimm, Birte, Ian Horrocks, & Ulrike Sattler. (2008). Deciding SHOQ^cap Knowledge Base Consistency using Alternating Automata.. Description Logics.1 indexed citations
18.
Glimm, Birte, Ian Horrocks, & Ulrike Sattler. (2007). Conjunctive Query Entailment for SHOQ. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).10 indexed citations
19.
Glimm, Birte, Ian Horrocks, & Ulrike Sattler. (2006). Conjunctive query answering for description logics with transitive roles. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 3–14.15 indexed citations
20.
Glimm, Birte & Ian Horrocks. (2005). Handling Cyclic Conjunctive Queries. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.