Birk Hagemeyer
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Franz J. NeyerJens LangeJan CrusiusFelix D. SchönbrodtChristian KandlerAnna E. KornadtMarcus MundChristine Finn
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (13 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (12 papers)Psychological Testing and Assessment (9 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Birk Hagemeyer
28 papers receiving 617 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Social Psychology 386
- Clinical Psychology 312
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 232
- Applied Psychology 152
- Sociology and Political Science 112
Countries citing papers authored by Birk Hagemeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Birk Hagemeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birk Hagemeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birk Hagemeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Birk Hagemeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birk Hagemeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birk Hagemeyer. The network helps show where Birk Hagemeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birk Hagemeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birk Hagemeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birk Hagemeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Birk Hagemeyer. Birk Hagemeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 132 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 81 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Birk Hagemeyer
Birk Hagemeyer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (13 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (12 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (152 citations), General Psychology (24 citations) and Social Psychology (386 citations). Birk Hagemeyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Franz J. Neyer, Jens Lange, Jan Crusius, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Christian Kandler, Anna E. Kornadt, Marcus Mund, Christine Finn, Jens B. Asendorpf and Wiebke Neberich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Current Directions in Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.