Birgit Prodinger

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
89 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Birgit Prodinger is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Rehabilitation and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Birgit Prodinger has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 22 papers in Rehabilitation and 18 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Birgit Prodinger's work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (40 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (19 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (16 papers). Birgit Prodinger is often cited by papers focused on Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (40 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (19 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (16 papers). Birgit Prodinger collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Birgit Prodinger's co-authors include Gerold Stucki, Alarcos Cieza, Jerome Bickenbach, Nora Fayed, Alan Tennant, Tanja Stamm, Paul Taylor, Melissa Selb, T. Bedirhan Üstün and Klaus Machold and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Birgit Prodinger

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their ... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Birgit Prodinger Switzerland 24 859 358 345 280 254 89 2.0k
Jerome Bickenbach Switzerland 19 748 0.9× 299 0.8× 244 0.7× 200 0.7× 128 0.5× 59 1.9k
M. Cardol Netherlands 22 818 1.0× 331 0.9× 374 1.1× 307 1.1× 161 0.6× 72 2.4k
Reuben Escorpizo Switzerland 28 828 1.0× 287 0.8× 260 0.8× 317 1.1× 566 2.2× 109 2.3k
John L. Melvin United States 24 694 0.8× 382 1.1× 489 1.4× 124 0.4× 188 0.7× 58 2.0k
Ayşe A. Küçükdeveci Türkiye 22 815 0.9× 302 0.8× 578 1.7× 278 1.0× 474 1.9× 63 2.4k
Åsa Lundgren‐Nilsson Sweden 25 605 0.7× 480 1.3× 604 1.8× 109 0.4× 256 1.0× 66 2.3k
Susan Stark United States 25 796 0.9× 251 0.7× 323 0.9× 141 0.5× 112 0.4× 107 2.5k
Sue Baptiste Canada 18 1.2k 1.4× 194 0.5× 520 1.5× 155 0.6× 364 1.4× 47 2.6k
Thomas Ewert Germany 20 1.6k 1.9× 479 1.3× 598 1.7× 305 1.1× 692 2.7× 53 3.2k
Sarah Munce Canada 25 400 0.5× 385 1.1× 296 0.9× 578 2.1× 200 0.8× 129 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Prodinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Prodinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Prodinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Prodinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Prodinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Prodinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Prodinger. The network helps show where Birgit Prodinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birgit Prodinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birgit Prodinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birgit Prodinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Birgit Prodinger. Birgit Prodinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stucki, Gerold, et al.. (2021). The potential of prediction models of functioning remains to be fully exploited: A scoping review in the field of spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 139. 177–190. 8 indexed citations
2.
Mukaino, Masahiko, Birgit Prodinger, Melissa Selb, et al.. (2021). Development of a clinical tool for rating the body function categories of the ICF generic-30/rehabilitation set in Japanese rehabilitation practice and examination of its interrater reliability. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 21(1). 121–121. 15 indexed citations
4.
Ehrmann, Cristina, et al.. (2020). Impact of spasticity on functioning in spinal cord injury: an application of graphical modelling. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 52(3). 0–0. 6 indexed citations
5.
Yu, Hainan, et al.. (2020). How Does the Measurement of Disability in Low Back Pain Map Unto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health?. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 100(4). 367–395. 8 indexed citations
6.
Prodinger, Birgit, Ayşe A. Küçükdeveci, Sim Kutlay, et al.. (2020). Cross-diagnostic scale-banking using rasch analysis: Developing a common reference metric for generic and health condition-specific scales in people with rheumatoid arthritis and stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 52(10). jrm00107–jrm00107. 4 indexed citations
7.
Prodinger, Birgit, et al.. (2019). Living with spinal cord injury in Mongolia: A qualitative study on perceived environmental barriers. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 43(4). 518–531. 19 indexed citations
8.
Melvin, John L., et al.. (2019). Content comparison of the Spinal Cord Injury Model System Database to the ICF Generic Sets and Core Sets for spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 57(12). 1023–1030. 5 indexed citations
9.
Tennant, Alan, et al.. (2019). The Functional Independence Measure 18-item version can be reported as a unidimensional interval-scaled metric: Internal construct validity revisited. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 51(3). 193–200. 36 indexed citations
10.
Aronsky, Dominik, et al.. (2017). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records. Applied Clinical Informatics. 8(3). 964–980. 23 indexed citations
11.
Prodinger, Birgit, et al.. (2017). Compiling standardized information from clinical practice: using content analysis and ICF Linking Rules in a goal-oriented youth rehabilitation program. Disability and Rehabilitation. 41(5). 613–621. 9 indexed citations
13.
Fekete, Christine, Marcel W. M. Post, Jerome Bickenbach, et al.. (2017). A Structured Approach to Capture the Lived Experience of Spinal Cord Injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 96(2). S5–S16. 42 indexed citations
15.
Cieza, Alarcos, Nora Fayed, Jerome Bickenbach, & Birgit Prodinger. (2016). Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disability and Rehabilitation. 41(5). 574–583. 412 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Prodinger, Birgit, C Ballert, Martin W. G. Brinkhof, Alan Tennant, & Marcel W. M. Post. (2016). Metric properties of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure - Self report in a community survey. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 48(2). 149–164. 31 indexed citations
18.
Reinhardt, Jan D., X Zhang, Birgit Prodinger, et al.. (2016). Towards the system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health in routine clinical practice: Empirical findings of a pilot study from Mainland China. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 48(6). 515–521. 14 indexed citations
20.
Prodinger, Birgit, Lynn Shaw, Debbie Laliberté Rudman, & Tanja Stamm. (2013). Negotiating disability in everyday life: ethnographical accounts of women with rheumatoid arthritis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 36(6). 497–503. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026