Bing Wei

851 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Bing Wei is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Bing Wei has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Control and Systems Engineering, 8 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Bing Wei's work include Pulsed Power Technology Applications (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers) and Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics (6 papers). Bing Wei is often cited by papers focused on Pulsed Power Technology Applications (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers) and Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics (6 papers). Bing Wei collaborates with scholars based in China, Canada and South Africa. Bing Wei's co-authors include Qi Feng, Haijiang Wang, Gaoyang Liu, Zhen Zhang, Xiao‐Zi Yuan, Hui Li, Weiping Xie, Meng Wang, Fan Guo and Dagang Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Power Sources, Review of Scientific Instruments and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

Bing Wei

14 papers receiving 626 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A review of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis on degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies

2017 569 citations Qi Feng, Xiao‐Zi Yuan et al. Journal of Power Sources profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bing Wei China	6	499	329	252	133	127	17	649
Eduardo Trifoni Italy	10	325 0.7×	231 0.7×	161 0.6×	128 1.0×	114 0.9×	29	570
Johannes Schaffert Germany	12	305 0.6×	211 0.6×	46 0.2×	30 0.2×	157 1.2×	19	563
F. Werkoff France	9	103 0.2×	136 0.4×	66 0.3×	22 0.2×	174 1.4×	18	402
L. Decker Germany	10	128 0.3×	415 1.3×	40 0.2×	42 0.3×	235 1.9×	19	602
Shoji Kamiya Japan	7	117 0.2×	295 0.9×	45 0.2×	36 0.3×	190 1.5×	9	510
Phi Long Nguyen Vietnam	10	130 0.3×	21 0.1×	71 0.3×	14 0.1×	91 0.7×	41	352
M. Tufiño‐Velázquez Mexico	14	298 0.6×	43 0.1×	117 0.5×	19 0.1×	208 1.6×	26	393
Fuyu Jiao Australia	8	72 0.1×	187 0.6×	36 0.1×	26 0.2×	142 1.1×	15	427
Guozhao Zhang China	12	168 0.3×	79 0.2×	29 0.1×	16 0.1×	192 1.5×	41	436
Thomas Funke Germany	5	68 0.1×	185 0.6×	35 0.1×	30 0.2×	133 1.0×	5	346

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Wei

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Wei

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Wei. The network helps show where Bing Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bing Wei

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bing Wei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bing Wei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bing Wei. Bing Wei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Guo, Fan, et al.. (2024). Influence of the Temperature of the Deionized Water on the Sensitivity of D-Dot Sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal. 24(7). 10196–10202.

Guo, Fan, Bing Wei, Weiping Xie, et al.. (2023). Characterization of the failure shots of an induction voltage adder. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 26(9). 1 indexed citations

Wei, Bing, et al.. (2022). Characteristics of the D-Dot Sensor for Measurement of High Voltage Pulse of a Water-Insulated Transmission Line. IEEE Sensors Journal. 23(3). 2385–2392. 2 indexed citations

Yuan, Chi, et al.. (2022). Cylindrical metal liner implosion at extremes of pressure and material velocity on an intense pulsed power facility-FP-2. Review of Scientific Instruments. 93(1). 13904–13904. 1 indexed citations

Wei, Bing, et al.. (2021). Frequency Response Properties of the B-Dot Sensors Employed on a High Current Pulsed Power Facility. IEEE Sensors Journal. 21(16). 17732–17737. 4 indexed citations

Guo, Zhaoliang, Yan Chen, Yinglei Li, et al.. (2020). Preliminary investigations on dynamic fracture of ductile metals by using electromagnetically driven expanding ring. AIP Advances. 10(10). 2 indexed citations

Guo, Fan, et al.. (2019). Determination of Magnetically Insulated Transmission Line Cathode Current of a 1.0-MV Pulsed Power Generator. IEEE Sensors Journal. 19(9). 3408–3414. 1 indexed citations

Guo, Fan, Weiping Xie, Zhi Wang, et al.. (2019). Design of a 1-MV induction cavity and validation of the two-dimensional circuit model. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 22(2). 6 indexed citations

Wang, Guilin, Bing Wei, Hengdi Zhang, et al.. (2018). Investigation of surface evolution for stainless steel electrode under pulsed megagauss magnetic field. Physics of Plasmas. 25(2). 2 indexed citations

10.

Wei, Bing, Fan Guo, Lin Chen, et al.. (2018). Coaxial–Conical Transition in Magnetically Insulated Transmission Line. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 46(6). 1913–1920. 3 indexed citations

11.

Wang, Guilin, et al.. (2018). Progress on high current pulse transmission based on the Primary Test Stand. 105. 1–6.

12.

Xu, Qiang, et al.. (2017). Radiation characteristics and implosion dynamics of Z-pinch dynamic hohlraums performed on PTS facility. Physics of Plasmas. 24(9). 10 indexed citations

13.

Feng, Qi, Xiao‐Zi Yuan, Gaoyang Liu, et al.. (2017). A review of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis on degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Journal of Power Sources. 366. 33–55. 569 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Wei, Bing, et al.. (2017). Mode selection of magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instability from the point of view of Landau phase transition theory. Physics of Plasmas. 24(8).

15.

Huang, Xianbin, Kunlun Wang, Si-Qun Zhang, et al.. (2015). Preliminary experimental results of tungsten wire-array Z-pinches on primary test stand. Physics of Plasmas. 22(7). 15 indexed citations

16.

Guo, Fan, Lin Chen, Bing Wei, et al.. (2015). Current Transmission Efficiency for Conical Magnetically Insulated Transmission Line on a 1.0-MV Linear Transformer Driver System. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 43(8). 2663–2669. 12 indexed citations

17.

Wei, Bing, et al.. (2010). Efficiency Analysis of an Electromagnetic Railgun With a Full Circuit Model. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 38(12). 3425–3428. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact