Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018)
2018297 citationsAngela H. Arthington, Anik Bhaduri et al.Frontiers in Environmental Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Young more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Young. The network helps show where Bill Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bill Young. Bill Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Arthington, Angela H., Anik Bhaduri, Stuart E. Bunn, et al.. (2018). The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018). Frontiers in Environmental Science. 6.297 indexed citations breakdown →
Bates, Bryson C., Stuart E. Bunn, Malcolm Cox, et al.. (2011). National climate change adaptation research plan: Freshwater biodiversity. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).3 indexed citations
6.
Owens, Jonathan, et al.. (2009). Explaining Ø and Overt Subjects in Spoken Arabic. ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth).3 indexed citations
7.
Young, Bill, Kevin J. Noone, & Will Steffen. (2006). Science Plan and Implementation Strategy.301 indexed citations
Ojima, Dennis S., et al.. (2005). Global Land Project: Science Plan and ImplementationStrategy.93 indexed citations
11.
Kremer, Hartwig, Martin Le Tissier, Peter Burbridge, et al.. (2005). Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone: Science Plan and Implementation Strategy.23 indexed citations
12.
Ojima, Dennis S., et al.. (2005). Global Land Project.20 indexed citations
13.
Broadgate, Wendy, et al.. (2004). The Surface Ocean - Lower Atmosphere Study: Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).4 indexed citations
14.
Parkes, Colin Murray, Pittu Laungani, & Bill Young. (2003). Death and Bereavement Across Cultures. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).106 indexed citations
Young, Bill, et al.. (1992). Geology and land-use planning: Great Broughton-Lamplugh area, Cumbria. Part 1, geology. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.